热处理工艺对40CrMnMo钢钻杆组织与性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.12.030

金属热处理 ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 195-198.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.12.030

热处理工艺对40CrMnMo钢钻杆组织与性能的影响

钟彬^1,2, 陈义庆^1,2, 孟凡磊³, 邸军³, 李琳^1,2, 高鹏^1,2, 艾芳芳^1,2, 伞宏宇^1,2

1.海洋装备金属材料及其应用全国重点实验室, 辽宁鞍山 114009;
2.鞍钢集团钢铁研究院, 辽宁鞍山 114009;
3.鞍山钢铁集团有限公司, 辽宁鞍山 114006

收稿日期:2025-07-28 修回日期:2025-10-12 发布日期:2026-01-06
作者简介:钟彬(1981—),男,正高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为腐蚀与防护,E-mail: 22941478@qq.com

Effect of heat treatment process on microstructure and properties of 40CrMnMo steel drill pipe

Zhong Bin^1,2, Chen Yiqing^1,2, Meng Fanlei³, Di Jun³, Li Lin^1,2, Gao Peng^1,2, Ai Fangfang^1,2, San Hongyu^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Metallic Materials for Marine Equipment and Applications, Anshan Liaoning 114009, China;
2. Anshan Iron & Steel Research Institute, Anshan Liaoning 114009, China;
3. Anshan Iron & Steel Group Corporation, Anshan Liaoning 114006, China

Received:2025-07-28 Revised:2025-10-12 Published:2026-01-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对40CrMnMo钢钻杆进行不同淬火方式的调质处理(870 ℃×40 min,水冷/油冷+600 ℃×80 min,空冷)和正火处理(870 ℃×40 min,空冷),利用金相显微镜、残余应力测试仪、拉伸试验机和冲击试验机对其组织和性能进行了观察和测试。结果表明,淬火冷却介质对钻杆的组织、残余应力和表面质量影响显著。钻杆的应变量和表面残余应力与介质的冷却能力分别呈负相关和正相关关系。调质处理钻杆的拉伸性能、屈强比和冲击性能都优于正火处理。与油淬处理相比,水淬冷却速度更快,马氏体板条间距更小,但表面残余应力较大,表面质量稍差,存在裂纹。采用油淬+高温回火处理钻杆试样的表面质量较好,无宏观裂纹,板条束相对细小,微观组织均匀,综合力学性能优良,屈强比高,冲击性能好。

关键词: 钻杆, 热处理, 淬火介质, 组织, 力学性能

Abstract: Quenching and tempering treatments (870 ℃×40 min, followed by water/oil cooling+600 ℃×80 min, air cooling) and normalizing treatment (870 ℃×40 min, air cooling) were applied to 40CrMnMo steel drill pipes. The microstructure and properties of the drill pipes were observed and tested using metallographic microscope, residual stress tester, tensile testing machine, and impact testing machine. The results indicate that the quenchant significantly affects the microstructure, residual stress and surface quality of the drill pipe. The strain of the drill pipe and its surface residual stress exhibit a negative correlation and a positive correlation with the cooling capacity of the quenchant, respectively. The tensile properties, yield ratio and impact property of the quenched and tempered drill pipes are all superior to those of drill pipes treated by normalizing. Compared with oil quenching, water quenching leads to smaller martensite lath spacing due to faster cooling speed, but higher surface residual stress and slightly poorer surface quality with cracks. The drill pipe treated by oil quenching+high temperature tempering has better surface quality, no macroscopic cracks, relatively small lath bundles, uniform microstructure, excellent comprehensive mechanical properties, high yield ratio and good impact property.

Key words: drill pipe, heat treatment, quenching medium, microstructure, mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TG172

钟彬, 陈义庆, 孟凡磊, 邸军, 李琳, 高鹏, 艾芳芳, 伞宏宇. 热处理工艺对40CrMnMo钢钻杆组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(12): 195-198.

Zhong Bin, Chen Yiqing, Meng Fanlei, Di Jun, Li Lin, Gao Peng, Ai Fangfang, San Hongyu. Effect of heat treatment process on microstructure and properties of 40CrMnMo steel drill pipe[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2025, 50(12): 195-198.

参考文献

[1]Macdonald K A, Bjune J V. Failure analysis of drillstrings [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2007, 14(8): 1641-1666.
[2]郭海滨, 左秀荣, 张新理, 等. 奥氏体化温度对奥氏体晶粒度及第二相固溶的影响 [J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2016, 28(2): 63-68.
Guo Haibin, Zuo Xiurong, Zhang Xinli, et al. Effect of austenitizing temperature on size of austenite grain and solid solution of second phase particles [J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2016, 28(2): 63-68.
[3]曹建军, 陈明安. 26CrMoNbTiB(S135)钻杆管热处理工艺的研究[J]. 金属材料与冶金工程, 2007, 35(2): 28-32.
Cao Jianjun, Chen Ming'an. Research on heat treatment technology of 26CrMoNbTiB (S135) drill pipe [J]. Metal Materials and Metallurgy Engineering, 2007, 35(2): 28-32.
[4]姜如松, 廖永红. 40CrMnMo钢单体泵泵体淬火开裂分析及对策[J]. 金属热处理, 2016, 41(12): 187-191.
Jiang Rusong, Liao Yonghong. Quenching crack analysis and counter measures of 40CrMnMo steel single pump body [J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2016, 41(12): 187-191.
[5]钟彬, 陈义庆, 孟凡磊, 等. 40CrMnMo钢钻杆料的裂纹缺陷分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(2): 228-231.
Zhong Bin, Chen Yiqing, Meng Fanlei, et al. Crack defect analysis of 40CrMnMo steel drill pipe material [J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(2): 228-231.
[6]Shaeri M H, Saghafian H, Shabestafi S G. Effects of austempering and martempering processes on amount of retained austenite in Cr-Mo steels (FMU-226) used in mill liner [J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2010, 17(2): 53-58.
[7]臧鑫士. 45CrMoV钢的显微组织分析[J]. 金属热处理学报, 1992, 13(4): 1-5.
Zang Xinshi. Microstructure analysis of 45CrMoV steel [J]. Transactions of Metal Heat Treatment, 1992, 13(4): 1-5.
[8]欧阳志英, 舒志强, 袁鹏斌. 屈强比对高强度高塑性钻杆性能的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册), 2013, 49(1): 17-21, 26.
Ouyang Zhiying, Shu Zhiqiang, Yuan Pengbin. Effect of yield ratio on the performance of high strength and high ductility drill pipe [J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part A: Physical Testing), 2013, 49(1): 17-21, 26.
[9]舒志强, 袁鹏斌, 欧阳志英, 等. 回火温度对26CrMo钻杆钢显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(6): 669-676.
Shu Zhiqiang, Yuan Pengbin, Ouyang Zhiying, et al. Effects of tempering temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of drill pipe steel 26CrMo [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2017, 53(6): 669-676.
[10]钟彬, 陈义庆, 李琳, 等. 淬火油温对40CrMnMo钢钻杆组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 98-102.
Zhong Bin, Chen Yiqing, Li Lin, et al. Effect of quenching oil temperature on the microstructure and properties of 40CrMnMo drill pipe [J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(6): 98-102.
[11]张家文, 付天亮, 吴昊, 等. 40CrNiMo7钢锻轴淬火开裂的原因分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(2): 213-218.
Zhang Jiawen, Fu Tianliang, Wu Hao, et al. Cause analysis on quenching cracking of 40CrNiMo7 steel forged shaft [J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(2): 213-218.
[12]潘健生, 周敬恩, 王广生, 等. 热处理手册[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2009: 100-109.
[13]谷曼. 热处理工艺中淬火裂纹的预防[J]. 合肥联合大学学报, 2001, 11(1): 100-105.
Gu Man. The prevention of quenching crackles in heat-treating technology [J]. Journal of Hefei Union University, 2001, 11(1): 100-105.

[1]	田育金, 杨胶溪, 高枫, 王高生, 刘琦, 李怀学. 激光等离子复合喷涂NiCr-Cr₃C₂涂层的组织与性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 1-6.
[2]	伊静, 董会, 王飞, 李鹏宇, 张永杰, 冯玉坤. 感应热处理超音速火焰喷涂NiCrBSiFe涂层的组织与性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 12-18.
[3]	吴保平, 付媛媛, 张绪亮, 孙长波, 杨草, 王凯, 吴剑涛. 热校形工艺对Ni₃Al基高温合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 34-38.
[4]	刘斌华, 李可尔, 赵鹏程, 陈威. Ti55531钛合金热轧对α相析出行为及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 76-85.
[5]	吉效科, 毛勇, 李茂, 张丛笑, 见飞龙, 庄磊, 王玮晨, 刘二勇. 不锈钢熔覆层的微观组织和腐蚀磨损性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 92-98.
[6]	吴庆美, 郭强, 卜凡征, 肖景江. 不同热镀锌层的组织与摩擦性能对比[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 113-117.
[7]	胡雁阵, 李婷, Carlos Gracia, Caraballo Isaac Toda, Carallero Francisca Garcia, 于皓. 均一化处理对增材制造镍基合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 118-124.
[8]	黄亮, 马辉, 王晓东, 包喜荣. 基于TMCP的P92钢管的在线形变热处理[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 132-139.
[9]	王天琪, 柴希阳, 罗小兵, 师仲然. 控轧控冷工艺对ULCB钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 146-150.
[10]	杨恬, 孙上清, 田彦文, 王涛, 任勇. 固溶处理温度和冷却速率对TC6钛合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 151-155.
[11]	李佳傲, 黄硕, 李瑞红, 赵莉萍, 王海燕, 杨礼林, 金自力. 时效时间对Mg-10Gd-2Sm-1Y-0.5Zr合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 156-160.
[12]	刘仕超, 贾虹锋, 胡宝佳, 田亚强, 陈连生. 等温淬火对高强度低合金钢贝氏体相变与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 161-164.
[13]	徐凤祥, 卢道胜, 秦小飞, 李秋杰, 吴高盛. 40Cr钢锥面零件的激光淬火[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 165-169.
[14]	柳会梅, 陈珍妮, 许立雄, 熊俊伟, 孙昌政, 胡海江. 连续退火时效时间对低碳钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 170-174.
[15]	张海东, 闫献国, 向瑾, 李晋峰, 高丽梅. 深冷处理对40CrNiMo钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(9): 175-180.

热处理工艺对40CrMnMo钢钻杆组织与性能的影响

Effect of heat treatment process on microstructure and properties of 40CrMnMo steel drill pipe

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价