淬火介质对7050铝合金热锻件组织和性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.01.047

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选用某汽车用7050铝合金热锻件,以20 K/min的速率将试样快速加热至746 K并保温1 h,然后将试样快速转移到浓度分别为0%(水)、5%、10%、20%、30%的PAG聚合物溶液和空气中淬火,再采用T74工艺(393 K保温6 h,436 K保温12 h)进行时效处理,分析不同PAG淬火剂浓度对7050铝合金试样残余应力、第二相粒子、抗拉强度和屈服强度的影响规律。结果表明,随着PAG淬火剂浓度的增加,该铝合金试样的残余应力逐渐减弱,第二相体积分数逐渐上升,抗拉强度和屈服强度逐渐下降。综合考虑,PAG淬火剂浓度设为10%~20%时,7050铝合金淬火试样具有相对较低的残余应力,其抗拉强度为512~519 MPa,屈服强度为472~478 MPa,能够满足抗拉强度大于510 MPa、屈服强度大于455 MPa的力学性能要求。

关键词: PAG淬火介质, 7050铝合金, 微观组织, 力学性能

Abstract: A 7050 aluminum alloy hot forging for automobile was selected, and the specimens were rapidly heated to 746 K with a rate of 20 K/min and held for 1 h. Then the specimens were rapidly transferred to the PAG polymer solution with concentrations of 0% (water), 5%, 10%, 20%, 30% and air to quench respectively, and finally the aging treatment was carried out using the T74 process (393 K for 6 h and 436 K for 12 h). The effects of different PAG quenchant concentrations on the residual stress, second-phase particles, tensile strength and yield strength of the 7050 aluminum alloy specimens were analyzed. The results show that with the increase of PAG quenchant concentration, the residual stress of the aluminum alloy specimens gradually weakens, the volume fraction of the second phase gradually increases, and the tensile strength and yield strength gradually decrease. Considering comprehensively, the PAG quenchant concentration of 10%-20% can meet the technical requirements, with which the quenched specimens of the 7050 aluminum alloy have relatively low residual stress, the tensile strength is 512-519 MPa and the yield strength is 472-478 MPa, and meeting the mechanical properties requirements of tensile strength greater than 510 MPa and yield strength greater than 455 MPa.

Key words: PAG quenching medium, 7050 aluminum alloy, microstructure, mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TG166.3

石佩斐, 张辉. 淬火介质对7050铝合金热锻件组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 290-295.

Shi Peifei, Zhang Hui. Effect of quenching medium on microstructure and properties of 7050 aluminum alloy hot forgings[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(1): 290-295.

参考文献

[1]张秋敏. 现代车辆新能源与节能减排技术[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2018.
[2]张金玲. 镁合金和铝合金在汽车轻量化上的应用及发展趋势[J]. 科技创新导报, 2019, 16(28): 92-93.
[3]Zhang W, Jun X. Advanced lightweight materials for automobiles: A review[J]. Materials and Design, 2022, 221: 110994.
[4]Wang D F, Li S H. Material selection decision-making method for multi-material lightweight automotive body driven by performance[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2022, 236(4): 730-746.
[5]刘贞山, 李英东, 赵经纬, 等. 汽车轻量化用铝合金材料及应用技术的研究[J]. 中国材料进展, 2022, 41(10): 786-795, 807.
Liu Zhenshan, Li Yingdong, Zhao Jingwei, et al. Research on aluminum alloy materials and application technology for automobile lightweight[J]. Materials China, 2022, 41(10): 786-795, 807.
[6]胡志力, 芦俊杰, 华林. 铝合金热冲压技术研究进展[J]. 锻压技术, 2022, 47(2): 1-11.
Hu Zhili, Lu Junjie, Hua Lin. Review of hot stamping technology for aluminum alloy[J]. Forging and Stamping Technology, 2022, 47(2): 1-11.
[7]武兆洋, 平宪忠, 郑宝超, 等. 不同水基淬火介质对ZG30CrMnSiMo低合金钢组织和耐磨性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(5): 60-65.
Wu Zhaoyang, Ping Xianzhong, Zheng Baochao, et al. Effect of different water-based quenching media on microstructure and wear resistance of ZG30CrMnSiMo low alloy steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(5): 60-65.
[8]李亚斐, 范艳艳, 刘经宇, 等. 不同淬火介质对45钢淬火性能的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2017, 46(10): 213-215.
Li Yafei, Fan Yanyan, Liu Jingyu, et al. Effect of different quenching media on quenching properties of 45 steel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2017, 46(10): 213-215.
[9]李亚楠, 张永安, 李锡武, 等. 不同淬火介质下7055铝合金厚板淬火内应力测试[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2017, 27(12): 2467-2472.
Li Yanan, Zhang Yongan, Li Xiwu, et al. Quenching residual stress of 7055 aluminum alloy thick plate with various quenching mediums[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2017, 27(12): 2467-2472.
[10]黄华. 淬火介质冷却性能的研究[D]. 大连: 大连交通大学, 2012.
[11]江心, 周亚军, 毛大恒, 等. 淬火介质对35CrMoV钢显微组织及耐磨性能的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2019, 48(8): 173-176.
Jiang Xin, ZhouYajun, Mao Daheng, et al. Effects of quenching medium on microstructure and wear resistance of 35CrMoV steel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2019, 48(8): 173-176.
[12]刘辉. 水溶性淬火介质KR9180在弹条扣件淬火中的工艺试验[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 274-276.
Liu Hui. Quenching test of water-soluble quenchant KR9180 for spring rod[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(4): 274-276.
[13]Zhang L, Feng X, Li Z G, et al. FEM simulation and experimental study on the quenching residual stress of aluminum alloy 2024[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2013, 227(7): 954-964.
[14]Yao Z H, Hao J, Dai W B, et al. Effects of quenching medium and tempering temperature on microstructures, mechanical properties, and fatigue behavior of EA4T steel[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2022, 165: 107179.
[15]Tran T X, Nguyen X P, Nguyen D N, et al. Effect of poly-alkylene-glycol quenchant on the distortion, hardness, and microstructure of 65Mn steel[J]. Computers, Materials and Continua, 2021, 67(3): 3249-3264.
[16]陈子银, 杨海峰. 淬火介质对数控刀具5Cr5MoSiV1Sr钢性能的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2018, 47(10): 250-253.
Chen Ziyin, Yang Haifeng. Effect of quenching medium on properties of 5Cr5MoSiV1Sr steel for NC tool[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47(10): 250-253.
[17]朱志云, 张雪辉, 陈慧玲, 等. 淬火介质对7249铝合金力学性能及晶间腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2015, 36(1): 47-51.
Zhu Zhiyun, Zhang Xuehui, Chen Huiling, et al. Effect of quenching agent on mechanical properties and intergranular corrosion behavior of 7249 aluminum alloy[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2015, 36(1): 47-51.
[18]Khan M A, Wang Y W, Afifi M A, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of an Al-Zn-Cu-Mg alloy processed by hot forming processes followed by heat treatments[J]. Materials Characterization, 2019, 157: 109901.
[19]Chen Y, Liu Z Y, Bai S, et al. The effect of multistage aging on mechanical properties and microstructure of forged 7050 aluminum alloys[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2019, 28(6): 3590-3599.