SLD-MAGIC冷作模具钢的热处理微畸变特性及其机理

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.03.022

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 128-134.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.03.022

SLD-MAGIC冷作模具钢的热处理微畸变特性及其机理

吴红庆^1,2, 毛宏^1,2, 邓志鹏^1,2, 宁辉^1,2, 吴晓春^1,2

1.上海大学材料科学与工程学院, 上海 200444;
2.上海大学省部共建高品质特殊钢冶金与制备国家重点实验室, 上海 200444

收稿日期:2023-09-28 修回日期:2024-02-02 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-04-24
通讯作者: 吴晓春,教授,博士,E-mail:xcwu@staff.shu.edu.cn
作者简介:吴红庆(1992—),男,博士,主要研究方向为模具钢材料研发与应用,E-mail:whq1911@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFB0300403);模具钢选材和用材技术的标准化研究(SKLASS 2021-11)

Heat treatment microdistortion characteristics and mechanism of SLD-MAGIC cold working die steel

Wu Hongqing^1,2, Mao Hong^1,2, Deng Zhipeng^1,2, Ning Hui^1,2, Wu Xiaochun^1,2

1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received:2023-09-28 Revised:2024-02-02 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-04-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用真空热处理炉测试了SLD-MAGIC和DC53冷作模具钢样块在1030 ℃淬火、及210 ℃回火和520 ℃回火3种热处理条件下尺寸的畸变率,并结合X射线衍射仪(XRD)、扫描电镜(SEM)、高精度差分膨胀仪、JMatPro软件等手段对微观结构、马氏体的特征参数、残留奥氏体含量、回火碳化物含量等进行分析。结果表明,SLD-MAGIC钢和DC53钢样块经上述3种热处理后体积膨胀,尺寸畸变率范围在0.02%~0.12%之间,DC53钢在同等热处理条件下平均尺寸畸变率约为SLD-MAGIC钢的1.9~2.2倍;SLD-MAGIC钢25~700 ℃以上的平均热膨胀系数比DC53钢的低0.15×10^-6℃^-1;SLD-MAGIC钢的马氏体碳含量和晶格常数分别为1.34%、2.8894×10^-10m,都比DC53钢小;并且热处理后的残留奥氏体含量和回火碳化物含量都比DC53钢少,因此SLD-MAGIC钢比DC53钢的尺寸膨胀效应更小,SLD-MAGIC钢具有热处理微畸变特性。

关键词: SLD-MAGIC冷作模具钢, 热处理微畸变, 马氏体, 残留奥氏体, 回火碳化物

Abstract: Vacuum heat treatment furnace was used to test the dimensional distortion rate of SLD-MAGIC and DC53 cold working die steel specimens under three heat treatment conditions of quenching at 1030 ℃, tempering at 210 ℃ and tempering at 520 ℃, and combined with X-ray diffractometer (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), high-precision differential dilatometer, JMatPro software to analyze the microstructure, characteristic parameters of martensite, the content of retained austenite and the content of secondary carbides. The results show that the volumes of the SLD-MAGIC and DC53 steel specimens expand after the three heat treatments, and their dimensional distortion rates range from 0.02% to 0.12%. The average dimensional distortion rate of the DC53 steel is about 1.9 to 2.2 times that of the SLD-MAGIC steel under the same heat treatment conditions. The average thermal expansion coefficient of the SLD-MAGIC steel from 25 ℃ to 700 ℃ is 0.15×10^-6℃^-1 lower than that of the DC53 steel, the carbon content and lattice constant of the martensite of the SLD-MAGIC steel are 1.34% and 2.8894×10^-10 m, respectively, which are smaller than that of the DC53 steel. The content of retained austenite and the content of secondary carbide of SLD-MAGIC steel after heat treatment are less than that of the DC53 steel. Therefore, the size expansion effect of the SLD-MAGIC steel is smaller than that of the DC53 steel, and the SLD-MAGIC steel has the characteristic of heat treatment microdistortion.

Key words: SLD-MAGIC cold working die steel, heat treatment microdistortion, martensite, retained austenite, carbide in tempering

中图分类号:

TG142.45

吴红庆, 毛宏, 邓志鹏, 宁辉, 吴晓春. SLD-MAGIC冷作模具钢的热处理微畸变特性及其机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 128-134.

Wu Hongqing, Mao Hong, Deng Zhipeng, Ning Hui, Wu Xiaochun. Heat treatment microdistortion characteristics and mechanism of SLD-MAGIC cold working die steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(3): 128-134.

参考文献

[1]赵冬梅, 倪磊, 蒋东旭, 等. 深冷处理对DC53冷作模具钢摩擦磨损性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(11): 250-254.
Zhao Dongmei, Ni Lei, Jiang Dongxu, et al. Effect of cryogenic treatment on friction and wear properties of DC53 cold work die steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(11): 250-254.
[2]Tu X, Xiao L, Cai Z, et al. The microstructure evolution and dimensional stability of TiC steel-bonded cemented carbide during stabilizing heat treatments[J]. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2023, 113: 106213.
[3]Farivar H, Prahl U, Hans M, et al. Microstructural adjustment of carburized steel components towards reducing the quenching-induced distortion[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2019, 264: 313-327.
[4]邱华兴. 高强韧冷冲压模具钢组织与性能研究[D]. 天津: 天津职业技术师范大学, 2022.
[5]Surm H, Frerichs F, Lübben T, et al. Distortion of rings due to inhomogeneous temperature distribution[J]. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 2012, 43(1/2): 29-36.
[6]吴正环, 谷历文, 黄历锋, 等. 典型热处理后不同冷作模具钢的残余奥氏体及对冲击韧性和尺寸稳定性的影响[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2021, 57(10): 1-5, 11.
Wu Zhenghuan, Gu Liwen, Huang Lifeng, et al. Residual austenite of different cold working die steels after the typical heat treatment and its influence on impact toughness and dimensional stability[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part A: Physical Testing) , 2021, 57(10): 1-5, 11.
[7]赵昌盛. 精密复杂模具热处理变形及预防[J]. 机械工人(热加工), 2005(11): 36-38.
[8]王吉星. 稳定处理对渗碳G13Cr4Mo4Ni4V钢尺寸稳定性的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳化工大学, 2021.
[9]Atraszkiewicz R, Januszewicz B, Kaczmarek L, et al. High pressure gas quenching: Distortion analysis in gears after heat treatment[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2012, 558: 550-557.
[10]Andersch C, Ehlers M, Hoffmann F, et al. Systematic analysis of the correlation between part geometry and distortion due to heat treatment[J]. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 2006, 37(1): 23-28.
[11]Li J, Feng Y, Zhang H, et al. Thermomechanical analysis of deep cryogenic treatment of navy C-ring specimen[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2014, 23(12): 4237-4250.
[12]Leskovsek V, Ule B. Influence of deep cryogenic treatment on microstructure, mechanical properties and dimensional changes of vacuum heat-treated high-speed steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2002, 29(3): 72-76.
[13]Sonar T, Lomte S, Gogte C, et al. Minimization of distortion in heat treated AISI D2 tool steel: Mechanism and distortion analysis[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2018, 20: 113-118.
[14]袁志钟, 陈露, 张伯承, 等. 冷作模具钢DC53热处理增韧技术[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(10): 15-22.
Yuan Zhizhong, Chen Lu, Zhang Bocheng, et al. Heat treatment technologies for toughening of cold working die steel DC53[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(10): 15-22.
[15]邱华兴, 吴正环, 黎肖辉, 等. 稳定化处理对DC53钢力学性能及尺寸稳定性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 138-141.
Qiu Huaxing, Wu Zhenghuan, Li Xiaohui, et al. Effect of stabilization treatment on mechanical properties and dimensional stability of DC53 steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(9): 138-141.
[16]刘梦思. 析出相对保持环用Mn18Cr18N钢力学性能影响研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018.
[17]彭旭. 5CrNiMoV热作模具钢的热处理过程研究及数值模拟[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2020.
[18]曹伟涛, 郑明杰, 丁文艺, 等. Fe₅₁Mn₃₀Cr₁₉低活化双相多主元合金中χ相与M₂₃C₆碳化物在475 ℃回火过程中的析出行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(6): 98-103.
Cao Weitao, Zheng Mingjie, Ding Wenyi, et al. Precipitation behavior of χ phase and M₂₃C₆ carbide in low-activation duplex multi-principal element alloy Fe₅₁Mn₃₀Cr₁₉ during tempering at 475 ℃[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(6): 98-103.

SLD-MAGIC冷作模具钢的热处理微畸变特性及其机理

Heat treatment microdistortion characteristics and mechanism of SLD-MAGIC cold working die steel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贾元伟. 退火工艺对热轧态含氮马氏体不锈钢420U6显微组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 98-102.
[2]	张碧清, 韩啸, 贺瑞军, 朱硕, 王赟, 郭凯宇. 基于灰色关联度分析的不锈钢离子渗氮层对磨损性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 174-181.
[3]	杨颖, 潘诗良, 许媛媛, 王泽民, 王占勇. 超低碳贝氏体钢双相区回火过程中逆转变奥氏体的演变[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 182-189.
[4]	张浩, 迟宏宵, 王成蹊, 马党参, 林鹏. V含量对高氮马氏体不锈钢组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 215-221.
[5]	刘禹, 孙迎建. 合金元素Si、V、Ti对40Cr13马氏体不锈钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 256-261.
[6]	刘自权, 栗克建, 张龙柱, 李守华, 冯毅, 曹鹏军. 超快冷工艺制备的超高强度马氏体钢的显微组织和性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 32-39.
[7]	董欣欣, 吴静, 李梦欢, 田亚强, 唐勤. 回火时间对Cr-Ni-Cu系舰船用高强钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 208-214.
[8]	于金瑞, 吴康俊, 于鑫泓, 冯以盛, 赵而团. 含偏析贝氏体弹簧钢的等温转变特性[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 53-60.
[9]	任武彬, 麻衡, 崔绍华, 王孟虎, 梁小凯, 孙新军. 不同微观组织低合金钢模拟海水浆体冲蚀磨损行为的对比[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 61-68.
[10]	袁志钟, 王梦飞, 张伯承, 段旭斌, 李表敏, 杨海峰, 罗锐, 程晓农. 冷作模具钢SKD11的热处理增韧技术[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 1-7.
[11]	陈浩, 丁文红, 方玉, 鲁小轩, 周莹涛, 陈灏. NM400钢终轧温度对其相变行为及残余应力的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 14-22.
[12]	杨树林, 赵吉庆, 闫磊, 杨钢. эи866合金锻件径向条纹形成原因与消除工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 279-282.
[13]	刘绪玮, 汪志刚, 林杰, 尹铁淇, 叶洁云, 张迎晖. 临界区淬火工艺对Cr-Ti-B系微碳钢组织及织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 72-79.
[14]	彭龙生, 刘春泉, 熊芬, 张颖, 黄伟, 林英华. 轧制方式及热处理工艺对中锰钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 106-112.
[15]	范振霞, 张育明, 董庆, 赵昊乾, 李亚硕, 魏巧灵. ER70S-6钢盘条冷拔断裂原因分析及工艺优化措施[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 272-275.