超快冷工艺制备的超高强度马氏体钢的显微组织和性能

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.02.005

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 32-39.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.02.005

超快冷工艺制备的超高强度马氏体钢的显微组织和性能

刘自权¹, 栗克建², 张龙柱¹, 李守华¹, 冯毅³, 曹鹏军²

1.河钢集团邯钢公司技术中心, 河北邯郸 056015;
2.重庆科技大学冶金与材料工程学院, 重庆 401331;
3.中国汽车工程研究院股份有限公司, 重庆 401122

收稿日期:2023-09-06 修回日期:2024-01-06 出版日期:2024-03-27 发布日期:2024-03-27
通讯作者: 栗克建,高级工程师,博士,E-mail:likejiann@cqust.edu.cn
作者简介:刘自权(1989—),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为汽车用钢产品研发,E-mail:liuziquan@hbisco.com。
基金资助:
河北省重大科技成果转化专项(18041033Z)

Microstructure and properties of ultra-high strength martensitic steel prepared by ultra-fast cooling process

Liu Ziquan¹, Li Kejian², Zhang Longzhu¹, Li Shouhua¹, Feng Yi³, Cao Pengjun²

1. Technology Centre, HBIS Hansteel, Handan Hebei 056015, China;
2. School of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China;
3. China Academy of Automotive Engineering Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401122, China

Received:2023-09-06 Revised:2024-01-06 Online:2024-03-27 Published:2024-03-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用超快冷工艺制备不同Mn添加量(1.01%、1.41%和1.74%,质量分数)的超高强度马氏体钢,采用XRD、SEM、EBSD、TEM等技术手段对比分析试验钢的原始奥氏体晶粒尺寸、高角度晶界比例、马氏体板条厚度和纳米析出相等显微组织差异,利用TDA技术分析了钢的抗氢脆性能,同时利用第一性原理研究钢中Cu析出相界面处的氢陷阱。结果表明,随着Mn添加量的增加,1500 MPa级马氏体钢的原始奥氏体晶粒尺寸均约为7 μm,但高Mn试样的马氏体板条更细、更密。第一性原理计算证明Cu与马氏体钢基体界面处可以形成良性氢陷阱,马氏体组织中大量的各类界面有助于在钢中形成更加分散的氢陷阱,氢在材料中就不容易局部聚集,从而降低材料氢脆断裂风险。基于超快冷工艺,Mn添加量增加可以实现1500 MPa级马氏体钢获得更多界面组织,微量的Cu析出也可以进一步提升材料的抗氢脆性能。

关键词: 马氏体钢, 氢脆, 残留奥氏体, 氢陷阱, 第一性原理

Abstract: Ultra-high strength martensitic steel with different Mn additions (1.01%, 1.41% and 1.74%, mass fraction) was prepared by ultra-fast cooling process, and the differences of microstructure, such as the prior austenite grain size, high-angle grain boundary ratio, thickness of martensite lath and nanoprecipitates were compared by XRD, SEM, EBSD and TEM. The hydrogen embrittlement property of the steel was analysed by TDA. The first-principles were used to study the hydrogen trap at the interface of the Cu precipitates and steel matrix. The results show that with the increase of Mn addition, the prior austenitic grain size of 1500 MPa grade martensitic steel is about 7 μm, but the martensitic lath in higher Mn specimen is thinner and denser. First-principles calculations show that harmless hydrogen traps can be formed at the interface between Cu and martensitic steel matrix, and a large number of various interfaces in the martensitic structure help to form more dispersed hydrogen traps in the steel, so that hydrogen is not easy to accumulate locally in the material, thereby reducing the risk of hydrogen embrittlement of the material. Based on the ultra-fast cooling process, the increase of Mn addition can achieve finer microstructure of 1500 MPa grade martensitic steel, and the Cu precipitation can also improve the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the steel.

Key words: martensitic steel, hydrogen embrittlement, retained austenite, hydrogen trap, first principles

中图分类号:

TG113

刘自权, 栗克建, 张龙柱, 李守华, 冯毅, 曹鹏军. 超快冷工艺制备的超高强度马氏体钢的显微组织和性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 32-39.

Liu Ziquan, Li Kejian, Zhang Longzhu, Li Shouhua, Feng Yi, Cao Pengjun. Microstructure and properties of ultra-high strength martensitic steel prepared by ultra-fast cooling process[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(2): 32-39.

参考文献

[1]Dga B, Lcma B, Ao A, et al. The role of plasticity and hydrogen flux in the fracture of a tempered martensitic steel: A new design of mechanical test until fracture to separate the influence of mobile from deeply trapped hydrogen[J]. Acta Materialia, 2020, 186: 133-148.
[2]王金荣, 许强, 逯志强, 等. 980 MPa级汽车用钢氢致延迟断裂性能[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2021, 43(1): 41-46.
Wang Jinrong, Xu Qiang, Lu Zhiqiang, et al. Hydrogen induced delayed fracture of 980 MPa grade automotive steel[J]. Plating and Finishing, 2021, 43(1): 41-46.
[3]Venezuela J, Liu Q L, Zhang M X, et al. A review of hydrogen embrittlement of martensitic advanced high-strength steels[J]. Corrosion Reviews, 2016, 34(3): 153-186.
[4]Fuchigami H, Minami§H, Nagumo || M, et al. Effect of grain size on the susceptibility of martensitic steel to hydrogen-related failure[J]. Philosophical Magazine Letters, 2006, 86(1): 21-29.
[5]Depover T, Verbeken K. The detrimental effect of hydrogen at dislocations on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of Fe-C-X alloys[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(5): 3050-3061.
[6]李金许, 王伟, 周耀, 等. 汽车用先进高强钢的氢脆研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 66-80.
Li Jinxu, Wang Wei, Zhou Yao, et al. A review of research status of hydrogen embrittlement for automotive advanced high-strength steels[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2020, 56(4): 66-80.
[7]Zhang S Q, Wan J F, Zhao Q Y, et al. Dual role of nanosized NbC precipitates in hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of lath martensitic steel[J]. Corrosion Science, 2020, 164: 108345.
[8]Jo M C, Yoo J S, Kim S, et al. Effects of Nb and Mo alloying on resistance to hydrogen embrittlement in 1.9 GPa-grade hot-stamping steels[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2020, 789: 1-11.
[9]Wei F G, Tsuzaki K. Quantitative analysis on hydrogen trapping of TiC particles in steel[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2006, 37(2): 331-353.
[10]Nagao A, Martin M L, Dadfarnia M, et al. The effect of nano-sized (Ti, Mo)C precipitates on hydrogen embrittlement of tempered lath martensitic steel[J]. Acta Materialia, 2014, 74: 244-254.
[11]Hokazono K, Kawamori M, Matsumoto Y, et al. Comparison of hydrogen behavior trapped at precipitated and undissolved vanadium carbide in vanadium-bearing high strength steels[C]//Iop Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 461: 1-5.
[12]Wei F G, Hara T, Tsuzaki K. Nano-precipitates design with hydrogen trapping character in high strength steel[J]. Advanced steels, 2011, 13: 87-92.
[13]Jin S P, Seong H G, Hwang J, et al. Adverse effects of Ni on the mechanical and corrosion-induced hydrogen embrittlement properties of ultra-strong giga steel used for automotive applications[J]. Materials and Design, 2020, 193: 108877.
[14]Lin Y C, D Chen, Chiang M H, et al. Response of hydrogen desorption and hydrogen embrittlement to precipitation of nanometer-sized copper in tempered martensitic low-carbon steel[J]. Metals and Materials Society, 2019, 71: 1349-1356.
[15]Shi X, Wei Y, Wei W, et al. Novel Cu-bearing high-strength pipeline steels with excellent resistance to hydrogen-induced cracking[J]. Materials and Design, 2016, 92: 300-305.
[16]Lin Y C, Mccarroll I E, Lin Y T, et al. Hydrogen trapping and desorption of dual precipitates in tempered low-carbon martensitic steel[J]. Acta Materialia, 2020, 196: 516-527.
[17]姜岳峰. 微观结构对高强钢氢脆敏感性的影响及机理[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2019.
Jiang Yuefeng. Effects of microstructures on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility and mechanism for high strength steels[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2019.
[18]Li S J, Akiyama E, Yuuji K, et al. Hydrogen embrittlement property of a 1700-MPa-class ultrahigh-strength tempered martensitic steel[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2010, 11(2): 25005.
[19]Chen Y S, Lu H, Liang J, et al. Observation of hydrogen trapping at dislocations, grain boundaries, and precipitates[J]. Science, 2020, 367: 171-175.
[20]Deng Q, Zhao W, Jiang W, et al. Hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility and safety control of reheated CGHAZ in X80 welded pipeline[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27: 1654-1663.
[21]Hojo T, Kobayashi J, Sugimoto K I, et al. Effects of alloying elements addition on delayed fracture properties of ultra high-strength TRIP-aided martensitic steels[J]. Metals-Open Access Metallurgy Journal, 2019, 10(1): 1-13.
[22]Luo H, Wang X, Liu Z, et al. Influence of refined hierarchical martensitic microstructures on yield strength and impact toughness of ultra-high strength stainless steel[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2020, 47(16): 7-23.
[23]Momotani Y, Shibata A, Yonemura T, et al. Effect of initial dislocation density on hydrogen accumulation behavior in martensitic steel[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2020, 178: 318-323.
[24]Sugimoto K I, Murata M, Song S M. Formability of Al-Nb bearing ultra high-strength TRIP-aided sheet steels with bainitic ferrite and/or martensite matrix[J]. ISIJ International, 2010, 50: 162-168.
[25]Pham D V, Kobayashi J, Sugimoto K I. Effects of microalloying on stretch-flangeability of TRIP-aided martensitic sheet steel[J]. Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, 2013, 99(11): 659-668.
[26]Kobayashi J, Tonegawa H, Sugimoto K I. Cold formability of 22SiMnCrB TRIP-aided martensitic sheet steel[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 81: 1336-1341.
[27]Momotani Y, Shibata A, Yonemura T, et al. Effect of initial dislocation density on hydrogen accumulation behavior in martensitic steel[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2020, 178: 318-323.
[28]Nagao A, Smith C D, Dadfarnia M, et al. The role of hydrogen in hydrogen embrittlement fracture of lath martensitic steel[J]. Acta Materialia, 2012, 60(13/14): 5182-5189.
[29]Zamanzade M, Mueller C, Velayarce J R, et al. Susceptibility of different crystal orientations and grain boundaries of polycrystalline Ni to hydrogen blister formation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(14): 7706-7714.
[30]Kimizuka H, Ogata S. Slow diffusion of hydrogen at a screw dislocation core in α-iron[J]. Physical Review B, 2011, 84(2): 024116.

超快冷工艺制备的超高强度马氏体钢的显微组织和性能

Microstructure and properties of ultra-high strength martensitic steel prepared by ultra-fast cooling process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	董欣欣, 吴静, 李梦欢, 田亚强, 唐勤. 回火时间对Cr-Ni-Cu系舰船用高强钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 208-214.
[2]	张兵, 毛艺蒙, 姜涛, 刘鑫. 18CrNiMo7-6钢齿轮轴开裂失效分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 297-300.
[3]	于金瑞, 吴康俊, 于鑫泓, 冯以盛, 赵而团. 含偏析贝氏体弹簧钢的等温转变特性[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 53-60.
[4]	任武彬, 麻衡, 崔绍华, 王孟虎, 梁小凯, 孙新军. 不同微观组织低合金钢模拟海水浆体冲蚀磨损行为的对比[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 61-68.
[5]	袁志钟, 王梦飞, 张伯承, 段旭斌, 李表敏, 杨海峰, 罗锐, 程晓农. 冷作模具钢SKD11的热处理增韧技术[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 1-7.
[6]	杨树林, 赵吉庆, 闫磊, 杨钢. эи866合金锻件径向条纹形成原因与消除工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 279-282.
[7]	彭龙生, 刘春泉, 熊芬, 张颖, 黄伟, 林英华. 轧制方式及热处理工艺对中锰钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 106-112.
[8]	刘永宝, 周丽娜, 刘明, 高翔, 石东丹. 回火参数对G95Cr18马氏体不锈钢显微组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(7): 103-110.
[9]	高学然, 陈晓虎, 原思宇, 王旭. 汽车用Q&P钢的研究进展[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(7): 245-253.
[10]	陈生超, 陈业生, 戎泽玉, 王红伟, 许鸿翔, 赵少甫, 郭敬强. 高速中间轴齿轮开裂失效分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(7): 287-291.
[11]	李博, 房颖, 李双喜. 延长20Cr13钢制肥料挤压轧辊使用寿命的真空热处理技术[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(6): 68-73.
[12]	石建强, 张思远, 江海涛, 李守华, 曹晓恩, 田世伟. 基于第一性原理的热浸镀Zn-Al-Mg镀层力学及耐蚀性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(6): 211-218.
[13]	贾涓, 江萱, 蒋建江, 宋新莉. 淬火配分时间对一种中锰钢耐磨性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(5): 270-274.
[14]	蔡贞祥, 程晓英, 彭浩, 李晓亮, 王兆丰. 回火温度对含Nb低合金高强度钢氢行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(4): 45-52.
[15]	卢茂勇, 徐乐, 何肖飞, 吴润. V微合金化对55SiCr钢组织和抗延迟断裂性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(4): 190-195.