QPQ技术中渗氮时间对合金铸铁组织及摩擦性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.10.041

金属热处理 ›› 2021, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 226-231.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.10.041

QPQ技术中渗氮时间对合金铸铁组织及摩擦性能的影响

王钦娟¹, 林少阳², 陈忠士¹, 刘东³

1.福建船政交通职业学院机械与智能制造学院, 福建福州 350007;
2.福建三钢冶金建设有限公司, 福建三明 365000;
3.福州大学机械工程及自动化学院, 福建福州 350116

收稿日期:2021-06-12 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-12-08
通讯作者: 刘东,高级实验师,E-mail:ldfzu@fzu.edu.cn
作者简介:王钦娟(1983—),女,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向为先进金属材料制备,E-mail:qinjuanwang@163.com
基金资助:
2020年福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JAT201073);福州市科技计划(2018-G-68)

Influence of nitriding time in QPQ technology on microstructure and friction properties of alloy cast iron

Wang Qinjuan¹, Lin Shaoyang², Chen Zhongshi¹, Liu Dong³

1. School of Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing, Fujian Chuanzheng Communications College, Fuzhou Fujian 350007, China;
2. Fujian Sansteel Metallurgical Construction Co., Ltd., Sanming Fujian 365000, China;
3. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou Fujian 350116, China

Received:2021-06-12 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-12-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用OM、SEM、硬度测试、摩擦磨损试验等方法研究了QPQ技术中渗氮时间对合金铸铁组织与摩擦性能的影响。结果表明,QPQ处理后,合金铸铁表面形成的渗层物相主要由Fe_2-3N、Fe₂O₃和FeO组成。渗层厚度的平方与渗氮时间存在线性关系,在580 ℃渗氮盐浴条件下,氮元素在合金铸铁中的扩散激活能为70.07 kJ/mol。在90~150 min渗氮时间内,随着渗氮时间延长,渗层的表面硬度值由522 HV0.05降低至441 HV0.05,当渗氮时间延长至180 min,表面硬度值回升至455 HV0.05。与未处理试样相比,QPQ处理的试样具有更小的摩擦因数,并且QPQ处理后试样表面的犁沟显著变浅,表面的金属剥落也得到明显改善,且随着渗氮时间的增加,渗层厚度增加且稳定材料。经180 min渗氮处理的QPQ试样具有最优综合性能,表面硬度值为455 HV0.05,摩擦因数为0.32。

关键词: QPQ技术, 渗氮时间, 合金铸铁, 组织, 摩擦磨损

Abstract: Influence of nitriding time in QPQ technology on the microstructure and friction properties of an alloy cast iron was studied by means of OM, SEM, hardness test, friction and wear test methods. The results show that after QPQ treatment, the nitriding layer formed on the surface of the alloy cast iron is mainly composed of Fe_2-3N, Fe₂O₃ and FeO. There is a linear relationship between the square of the nitriding layer thickness and the nitriding time. Under the condition of nitriding salt bath at 580 ℃, the activation energy of nitrogen diffusion in the alloy cast iron is 70.07 kJ/mol. Within the nitriding time range of 90-150 min, with the increase of the nitriding time, the surface hardness value of the nitriding layer decreases from 522 HV0.05 to 441 HV0.05, while when the nitriding time is extended to 180 min, the surface hardness value rises back to 455 HV0.05. Compared with the untreated specimen, the QPQ-treated specimen has a smaller friction coefficient, and after the QPQ treatment, the furrows on the surface of the specimen become significantly shallower, the metal peeling at the surface is also significantly improved. As the nitriding time increases, the thickness of the nitriding layer increases and the material is stabilized. The QPQ specimen after 180 min nitriding has the best comprehensive properties, with surface hardness value of 455 HV0.05 and friction coefficient of 0.32.

Key words: QPQ technology, nitriding time, alloy cast iron, microstructure, friction and wear

中图分类号:

TG156.8

王钦娟, 林少阳, 陈忠士, 刘东. QPQ技术中渗氮时间对合金铸铁组织及摩擦性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(10): 226-231.

Wang Qinjuan, Lin Shaoyang, Chen Zhongshi, Liu Dong. Influence of nitriding time in QPQ technology on microstructure and friction properties of alloy cast iron[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(10): 226-231.

参考文献

[1]Edenhofer B. Physical and metallurgical aspects of ion nitriding[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 1974, 1(2): 59-67.
[2]Li Y, Wang L, Zhang D, et al. Influence of bias voltage on the formation and properties of iron-based nitrides produced by plasma nitriding[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2010, 497(1/2): 285-289.
[3]Sarma B, Chandran K S R. Accelerated kinetics of surface hardening by diffusion near phase transition temperature: Mechanism of growth of boride layers on titanium[J]. Acta Materialia, 2011, 59(10): 4216-4228.
[4]Liu Y, Sun Y, Zhang W, et al. Effect of QPQ nitriding parameters on properties of pearlite ductile cast iron[J]. International Journal of Metalcasting, 2020, 14(2): 556-563.
[5]Funatani K. Low-temperature salt bath nitriding of steels[J]. Metal Science and Heat Treatment, 2004, 46(7/8): 277-281.
[6]Medeiros L H S, Moreto J A, Manfrinato M D, et al. Micro abrasive wear behaviour study of carburization and ion plasma nitriding of P20 steel[J]. Materials Research-Ibero-American Journal of Materials, 2016, 19(3): 686-694.
[7]Lu S, Meng F, Cai W, et al. Effect of QPQ treatment on the performance for H13 die steel[J]. Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, 2017, 23(3): 251-256.
[8]Limodin N, Verreman Y. Fatigue strength improvement of a 4140 steel by gas nitriding: Influence of notch severity[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2006, 435: 460-467.
[9]Limodin N, Verreman Y, Tarfa T N. Axial fatigue of a gas-nitrided quenched and tempered AISI 4140 steel: Effect of nitriding depth[J]. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2003, 26(9): 811-820.
[10]Cai W, Meng F, Gao X, et al. Effect of QPQ nitriding time on wear and corrosion behavior of 45 carbon steel[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2012, 261: 411-414.
[11]Zhang L, Ren C, Yu Q, et al. Microstructure and properties of 1Cr12Ni2WMoVNb (GX-8) steel bored barrels with and without QPQ treatment[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2017, 315: 95-104.
[12]Wang J, Lin Y, Yan J, et al. Modification of AISI 304 stainless steel surface by the low temperature complex salt bath nitriding at 430 ℃[J]. ISIJ International, 2012, 52(6): 1118-1123.
[13]Wang J, Lin Y, Li M, et al. Effects of the treating time on microstructure and erosion corrosion behavior of salt-bath-nitrided 17-4PH stainless steel[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2013, 44(4): 1010-1016.
[14]林少阳, 刘东, 程超增. 感应淬火对合金铸铁组织与油摩擦性能的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2020, 49(11): 236-244.
Lin Shaoyang, Liu Dong, Cheng Chaozeng. Effect of induction hardening on microstructure and oil friction properties of alloy cast iron[J]. Surface Technology, 2020, 49(11): 236-244.
[15]Yeung C F, Lau K H, Li H Y, et al. Advanced QPQ complex salt bath heat treatment[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1997, 66(1/3): 249-252.
[16]向红亮, 吴高翔, 刘东. QPQ氮化时间对316L不锈钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 特种铸造及有色合金, 2017, 37(6): 585-589.
Xiang Hongliang, Wu Gaoxiang, Liu Dong. Effects of QPQ nitriding time on microstructure and properties of 316L stainless steel[J]. Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys, 2017, 37(6): 585-589.
[17]Chen F S, Wang K L. The kinetics and mechanism of multi-component diffusion on AISI 1045 steel[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 1999, 115(2/3): 239-248.
[18]Sen S, Sen U, Bindal C. An approach to kinetic study of borided steels[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2005, 191(2/3): 274-285.
[19]Torchane L, Bilger P, Dulcy J, et al. Control of iron nitride layers growth kinetics in the binary Fe-N system[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1996, 27(7): 1823-1835.
[20]Zhu Y. The influence of iron oxides on wheel-rail contact: A literature review[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2018, 232(3): 734-743.
[21]Zhu Y, Olofsson U, Nilsson R. A field test study of leaf contamination on railhead surfaces[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2014, 228(1): 71-84.
[22]李兆祥. QPQ工艺参数对SAF2906双相不锈钢渗层组织与性能的影响[D]. 福州: 福州大学, 2014.
Li Zhaoxiang. Effect of QPQ process parameters on microstructures and properties of SAF2906 duplex stainless steel[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2014.

QPQ技术中渗氮时间对合金铸铁组织及摩擦性能的影响

Influence of nitriding time in QPQ technology on microstructure and friction properties of alloy cast iron

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王玉岱, 刘洋, 朱言言, 田象军, 程序, 冉先喆, 钱婷婷. 热处理对复合制造AerMet100超高强度钢组织均匀性与拉伸性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 1-9.
[2]	张子延, 陈君, 陈晓亚, 李全安, 刘建鑫. 固溶时效处理对Mg-4Sm-3Gd-0.5Zr合金显微组织和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 10-16.
[3]	梁恩溥, 徐乐, 杨勇, 王毛球. 添加Al、Cu对40CrNi3MoV钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 17-23.
[4]	祁晓亮, 李岩, 定巍, 赵增武. 含Al中锰TRIP钢原始组织对临界退火后组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 24-29.
[5]	陈保安, 张静媛, 祝志祥, 韩钰, 潘学东, 张磊, 陈素红. 化学成分对高强Al-Mg-Si合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 30-38.
[6]	陈东俊, 李广阳, 刘刚. 时效处理对AlSi9Cu3压铸铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 53-56.
[7]	陈连生, 张露友, 田亚强, 杨子旋, 李红斌, 潘红波, 魏英立. 低碳高强舰船用钢的CCT曲线及其组织性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 63-68.
[8]	贾昌远, 霍元明, 何涛, 霍存龙, 刘克然. 40CrNiMo钢高温拉伸变形行为和组织演变规律[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 69-74.
[9]	王云龙, 余伟, 张昳, 史佳新, 李明辉. 奥氏体化温度对贝氏体钢等温转变及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 80-85.
[10]	刘丽艳, 毕文珍, 韦习成. Mn元素对热冲压钢镀锌层组织演变的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 93-99.
[11]	付锡彬, 陈子豪, 张可, 赵时雨, 孙新军, 朱正海, 梁小凯, 雍岐龙. 淬火温度对高Ti低合金耐磨钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 122-127.
[12]	宿鹏吉, 麻永林, 董丽丽, 杨雪峰. 磁场预退火处理对CGO钢组织与织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 128-132.
[13]	李立, 曾艳, 吴晓春. 4Cr5Mo2VCo钢的热处理工艺优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 133-140.
[14]	吕杰晟, 宋志刚, 何建国, 丰涵, 郑文杰, 朱玉亮. S32205双相不锈钢冷轧退火组织转变及强塑化机理分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 141-145.
[15]	王琪, 吴光亮. 回火温度对1100 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 146-150.