渗碳处理高强齿轮钢BG801的高温疲劳行为

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.03.041

金属热处理 ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 255-262.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.03.041

渗碳处理高强齿轮钢BG801的高温疲劳行为

陈为浩^1,2, 许自宽^1,2, 谷雪忠^1,2, 杨卯生³, 王斌^1,2, 张鹏^1,2, 张哲峰^1,2

1.中国科学院金属研究所沈阳材料科学国家研究中心, 辽宁沈阳 110016;
2.中国科学技术大学材料科学与工程学院, 辽宁沈阳 110016;
3.钢铁研究总院有限公司特殊钢研究院, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2024-09-26 修回日期:2025-01-10 出版日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-05-14
通讯作者: 王斌,副研究员,博士,E-mail:bwang12s@imr.ac.cn
作者简介:陈为浩(1999—),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为不同表面处理齿轮钢的旋转弯曲疲劳性能与损伤机理,E-mail:whchen22s@imr.ac.cn。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(J2019-VI-0019-0134)

High temperature fatigue behavior of carburized high-strength gear steel BG801

Chen Weihao^1,2, Xu Zikuan^1,2, Gu Xuezhong^1,2, Yang Maosheng³, Wang Bin^1,2, Zhang Peng^1,2, Zhang Zhefeng^1,2

1. Shenyang National Laboratory Center for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenyang Liaoning 110016, China;
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang Liaoning 110016, China;
3. Research Institute of Special Steels, Central Iron and Steel Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100081, China

Received:2024-09-26 Revised:2025-01-10 Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对BG801齿轮钢进行理论渗层深度1.1和1.3 mm的渗碳处理后,测试表征了两种不同渗碳层深度试样的显微组织、室温硬度、500 ℃高温硬度、残余应力和500 ℃高温旋转弯曲疲劳,并分析了影响疲劳性能的主要因素。结果表明,在渗碳层区,渗碳层理论深度1.3 mm试样的碳化物含量、硬度和残余压应力都要高于渗碳层理论深度1.1 mm试样;渗碳层理论深度1.1和1.3 mm试样的500 ℃高温旋转弯曲疲劳强度分别为675和850 MPa。在渗碳层区,渗碳层理论深度1.3 mm试样具有相对较高的硬度,这能在一定程度上抑制微裂纹萌生;另外,由于综合残余应力与碳化物尺寸的影响,在相同外加循环应力作用下,渗碳层理论深度1.3 mm试样所承受的疲劳裂纹扩展驱动能量要小于渗碳层理论深度1.1 mm试样,这是渗碳层理论深度1.3 mm试样疲劳性能较优的另一原因。

关键词: BG801齿轮钢, 渗碳处理, 硬度, 残余应力, 高温旋转弯曲疲劳

Abstract: After carburizing treatment with theoretical case depths of 1.1 and 1.3 mm on BG801 gear steel, the microstructure, room temperature hardness, 500 ℃ high temperature hardness, residual stress, and 500 ℃ high temperature rotating bending fatigue of this two specimens were tested and characterized, and the main factors affecting fatigue property were analyzed. The results show that in the carburized zone, the carbide content, hardness, and residual compressive stress of the specimens with a theoretical case depth of 1.3 mm are higher than those of the specimens with a theoretical case depth of 1.1 mm. The rotating bending fatigue strength of the specimens with theoretical case depths of 1.1 and 1.3 mm at 500 ℃ is 675 and 850 MPa, respectively. In the carburized zone, the specimen with a theoretical case depth of 1.3 mm has relatively high hardness, which can suppress the initiation of microcracks to a certain extent. In addition, combined with the effect of residual stress and carbide size, the fatigue crack propagation driving energy of the specimen with a theoretical case depth of 1.3 mm is smaller than that of the specimen with a theoretical case depth of 1.1 mm under the same external applied cyclic stress, which is another reason why the fatigue property of the specimen with a theoretical case depth of 1.3 mm is better.

Key words: BG801 gear steel, carburization, hardness, residual stress, high temperature rotating bending fatigue

中图分类号:

TG142.1

陈为浩, 许自宽, 谷雪忠, 杨卯生, 王斌, 张鹏, 张哲峰. 渗碳处理高强齿轮钢BG801的高温疲劳行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 255-262.

Chen Weihao, Xu Zikuan, Gu Xuezhong, Yang Maosheng, Wang Bin, Zhang Peng, Zhang Zhefeng. High temperature fatigue behavior of carburized high-strength gear steel BG801[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2025, 50(3): 255-262.

参考文献

[1] 耿思远, 杨卯生, 赵昆渝. 温度对高钴钼不锈轴承钢高周疲劳性能的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2018, 53(12): 77-85.
Geng Siyuan, Yang Maosheng, Zhao Kunyu. Influence of temperature on high cycle fatigue properties of high cobalt molybdenum stainless bearing steel[J]. Iron and Steel, 2018, 53(12): 77-85.
[2] 侯智鹏, 杨卯生, 赵昆渝, 等. 高温与应力耦合作用下Cr-Co-Mo-Ni齿轮轴承钢微观组织演变[J]. 钢铁, 2014, 49(4): 80-85.
Hou Zhipeng, Yang Maosheng, Zhao Kunyu, et al. Microstructure evolution research of Cr-Co-Mo-Ni gear and bearing steel under action of temperature and steel coupling[J]. Iron and Steel, 2014, 49(4): 80-85.
[3] Matlock D K, Alogab K A, Rechards M D, et al. Surface processing to improve the fatigue resistance of advanced bar steels for automotive applications[J]. Materials Research, 2005, 8(4): 453-459.
[4] Asi O, Can A Ç, Pineaul J, et al. The relationship between case depth and bending fatigue strength of gas carburized SAE 8620 steel[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2007, 201(12): 5979-5987.
[5] 王博, 杨卯生, 赵昆渝. 双真空冶炼高合金轴承钢后真空表面渗碳疲劳性能的研究[J]. 真空科学与技术学报, 2016, 36(7): 838-843.
Wang Bo, Yang Maosheng, Zhao Kunyu. Fatigue resistance of surface-carburized Cr-Co-Mo-Ni bearing steel refined by vacuum melting[J]. Chinese Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 2016, 36(7): 838-843.
[6] Liu Z, Wang S, Feng Y, et al. Exploration on the fatigue behavior of low-temperature carburized 316L austenitic stainless steel at elevated temperature[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2022, 850: 143562.
[7] Jiang Y, Sun N, Peng Y, et al. Stability of low-temperature-gaseous-carburization layer in AISI316L stainless steel at high temperature[J]. Surface and Interfaces, 2021, 23: 100898.
[8] Murakami Y, Kodama S, Konuma S. Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. I: Basic fatigue mechanism and evaluation of correlation between the fatigue fracture stress and the size and location of non-metallic inclusions[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 1989, 11(5): 291-298.
[9] 马永庆, 高洪涛, 章晓静, 等. CrWMn钢中添加微量Mo对网状碳化物的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(4): 34-38.
Ma Yongqing, Gao Hongtao, Zhang Xiaojing, et al. Effect of adding little Mo on network carbide in CrWMn steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(4): 34-38.
[10] 王会, 王昊杰, 贾涛, 等. 航空轴承钢的真空低压渗碳工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(1): 1-5.
Wang Hui, Wang Haojie, Jia Tao, et al. Low pressure carburizing process for aviation bearing steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(1): 1-5.
[11] Xiao N, Hui W, Zhang Y, et al. High-cycle fatigue behavior of vacuum-carburized 20Cr2Ni4 steel with different case depths[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2019, 28: 3413-3422.
[12] Minamizawa K, Arakawa J, Akebono H, et al. Fatigue limit estimation for carburized steels with surface compressive residual stress considering residual stress relaxation[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2022, 160: 106846.
[13] 尹龙承. 14Cr14Co13Mo4钢Ni缓冲层法渗碳及热处理工艺研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
[14] 杜宁宇. M50轴承钢碳化物调控与疲劳性能研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2022.
[15] 杨芳, 丁志敏. 耐磨高锰钢的发展现状[J]. 机车车辆工艺, 2006(6): 6-9.
[16] Zhang P, Li S X, Zhang Z F. General relationship between strength and hardness[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2011, 529: 62-73.
[17] 高玉魁. 残余应力基础理论及应用[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版, 2019.
[18] 薛河, 侯鹏飞, 李富强, 等. 残余应力与304奥氏体不锈钢表面硬度的关系[J]. 热加工工艺, 2020, 49(22): 44-47.
Xue He, Hou Pengfei, Li Fuqiang, et al. Relationship between residual stress and surface hardness of 304 austenitic stainless steel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2020, 49(22): 44-47.
[19] Liu Z, Zhang S, Wang S, et al. On the fatigue behavior of low-temperature gaseous carburized 316L austenitic stainless steel: Experimental analysis and predictive approach[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2020, 793: 139651.
[20] Tokaji K, Kohyama K, Akita M. Fatigue behaviour and fracture mechanism of a 316 stainless steel hardened by carburizing[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2004, 26(5): 543-551.
[21] Fan K, Liu D, Liu Y, et al. Competitive effect of residual stress and surface roughness on the fatigue life of shot peened S42200 steel at room and elevated temperature[J]. Tribology International, 2023, 183: 108422.
[22] Genel K. Estimation method for the fatigue limit of case hardened steels[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2005, 194(1): 91-95.
[23] 刘明霞, 王东, 张文康, 等. 喷完强化对17-4PH不锈钢室温及高温疲劳性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(11): 22124-22129.

渗碳处理高强齿轮钢BG801的高温疲劳行为

High temperature fatigue behavior of carburized high-strength gear steel BG801

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	兖利鹏, 孙瑞雪, 马秉馨, 付靖, 苏光, 李全安, 郑鸿江. 时效处理对热挤压态Mg-Gd-Y-Sm-Zr合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 9-15.
[2]	王广, 殷天青, 孙亚松, 王鑫, 柯汉章, 奚邱炎, 郝琛, 李子洲. 淬火温度对403马氏体不锈钢组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 57-63.
[3]	孙江波, 段路昭, 任帅, 孙彩凤, 高志新, 彭飞. 热处理工艺对20CrMoH钢齿轮锻件组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 143-146.
[4]	张志兴, 王海龙, 文辉, 刘建, 田宾华, 胡林泉. 钎具钢23CrNi3MoA的静态CCT曲线测定与退火工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 232-236.
[5]	李月琛, 顾晋, 张林, 谢焕钧, 郑军, 袁静. 等离子体渗氮对钛合金表面镀渗Ti-N复合改性层组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 277-283.
[6]	赵峥嵘, 张雲飞, 赵英利, 樊明强, 白丽娟, 刘丽君. 塑料模具用4Cr13钢的连续冷却转变分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 69-73.
[7]	陈永祥, 吕和生, 杨刚, 李勇, 王春莉, 仲博颖. 偏析组织对内齿圈感应淬火层组织与硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 86-89.
[8]	陈千, 陈正宗, 刘正东, 蔡文河, 姜海峰, 包汉生, 何西扣. 热循环峰值温度对G115钢管热影响区微观组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 114-120.
[9]	陈晟楠, 彭睿智, 吴晓春. 热处理工艺对SDP80C钢组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 241-246.
[10]	于朋翰, 严昊明, 杨帅, 于兴福, 刘永吉, 代友贵. 扩散时间对真空低压渗碳20CrMnTi钢组织与硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 251-255.
[11]	李瑶, 张伟, 李朝青. 18CrNiMo7-6钢中小模数齿轮的渗碳淬火处理[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 260-263.
[12]	王庆田, 满蛟, 王俊成, 刘庚根, 杨斌. WC含量对AlCrFe₂Ni₂Mo_0.9高熵合金涂层组织及耐磨性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 282-291.
[13]	罗乙淞, 王方舟, 祝伟, 陈甥怡, 罗德福. PIP/LQ复合工艺对炮钢材料性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 298-303.
[14]	杨玉, 王天筱, 艾铖珅, 许成. 钒对过共析工具钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(1): 36-41.
[15]	王程明, 白丽娟, 宋月, 刘丽君, 谷秀锐, 李惠敏. 海洋平台用EH36钢的SHCCT曲线测定与分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(1): 58-62.