基于激光诱导击穿光谱表征GCr15钢的硬度

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.01.048

金属热处理 ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 284-289.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.01.048

基于激光诱导击穿光谱表征GCr15钢的硬度

李铸^1,2, 张庆永¹, 孔令华^1,2, 练国富¹, 杨金伟^1,2

1.福建工程学院机械与汽车工程学院, 福建福州 350118;
2.数字福建工业制造物联网实验室, 福建福州 350118

收稿日期:2021-08-19 修回日期:2021-10-13 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-02-18
通讯作者: 孔令华,教授,博士,E-mail: 15392030898@163.com
作者简介:李铸(1995—),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为金属材料性能检测,E-mail: Rheichoo@163.com。
基金资助:
福建省科技重大专项专题项目(2020HZ03018); 福建省教育科研专项(GY-Z21004)

Characterization of hardness for GCr15 steel based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Li Zhu^1,2, Zhang Qingyong¹, Kong Linghua^1,2, Lian Guofu¹, Yang Jinwei^1,2

1. School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou Fujian 350118, China;
2. Digital Fujian Industrial Manufacturing IoT Lab, Fuzhou Fujian 350118, China

Received:2021-08-19 Revised:2021-10-13 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用激光诱导击穿光谱对GCr15钢不同温度回火后的光谱稳定性、特征谱线强度、等离子体温度和电子密度的变化趋势进行了分析,研究了特征谱线强度比、等离子体温度和硬度之间的关系。结果表明:不同温度回火后的样品的光谱特性和等离子体特性存在差异,但原子谱线强度均随回火温度的升高呈上升趋势,离子谱线强度均随回火温度升高呈下降趋势;特征谱线强度比和等离子体温度与样品的硬度均呈现出较好的正相关关系。表明GCr15钢热处理之后硬度可以通过激光诱导击穿光谱法测量。

关键词: 激光诱导击穿光谱, 热处理, 光谱分析, 等离子体温度, GCr15钢

Abstract: Spectral stability, characteristic line intensity, plasma temperature and electron density of GCr15 steel after tempering at different temperatures were analyzed by using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy method, and the relationships between characteristic line intensity ratio, plasma temperature and hardness were studied. The results show that the spectral and plasma characteristics of the specimens tempered at different temperatures are different, however, with the increase of tempering temperature, the atomic spectral line intensity increases, while the ion spectral line intensity decreases. Meanwhile, The characteristic line intensity ratio and plasma temperature have good positive correlation with the hardness of the specimens, which shows that the hardness of the GCr15 steel after heat treatment can be measured by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy method.

Key words: laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, heat treatment, spectral analysis, plasma temperature, GCr15 steel

中图分类号:

TG142.1

李铸, 张庆永, 孔令华, 练国富, 杨金伟. 基于激光诱导击穿光谱表征GCr15钢的硬度[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 284-289.

Li Zhu, Zhang Qingyong, Kong Linghua, Lian Guofu, Yang Jinwei. Characterization of hardness for GCr15 steel based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(1): 284-289.

参考文献

[1]王萍, 沈千成, 吴旭明, 等. 加热气氛对GCr15轴承钢氧化和脱碳特性的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2018, 47(22): 78-81, 84.
Wang Ping, Shen Qiancheng, Wu Xuming, et al. Effect of heating atmosphere on oxidation and decarburization properties of GCr15 bearing steel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47(22): 78-81, 84.
[2]李建国. 成分设计与热处理对轴承钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 铸造技术, 2018, 39(11): 175-178.
Li Jianguo. Effect of composition design and heat treatment on microstructure & mechanical properties of bearing steel[J]. Foundry Technology, 2018, 39(11): 175-178.
[3]马超, 罗海文. GCr15轴承钢热处理过程中碳化物的析出与演变行为[J]. 材料工程, 2017, 45(6): 97-103.
Ma Chao, Luo Haiwen. Precipitation and evolution behavior of carbide during heat treatments of GCr15 bearing steel[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2017, 45(6): 97-103.
[4]覃羡烘. 回火温度对GCr15机械轴承钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2021, 50(6): 120-122.
Qin Xianhong. Effects of tempering temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of GCr15 mechanical bearing steel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2021, 50(6): 120-122.
[5]任佳, 高勋. 飞秒细丝-纳秒激光诱导击穿光谱技术对土壤重金属Pb元素检测[J]. 光学精密工程, 2019, 27(5): 1069-1074.
Ren Jia, Gao Xun. Detection of heavy metal Pb in soil by filament-nanosecond laser induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2019, 27(5): 1069-1074.
[6]杨金伟, 孔令华, 付洪波, 等. 激光诱导击穿光谱表征3D打印18Ni300模具钢表面硬度[J]. 激光与红外, 2020, 50(6): 668-674.
Yang Jinwei, Kong Linghua, Fu Hongbo, et al. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy characterizations of surface hardness of 3D printed 18Ni300 die steel[J]. Laser and Infrared, 2020, 50(6): 668-674.
[7]李云红, 文达, 李弘昊, 等. 煤样高度对激光测量煤灰分准确度影响的研究[J]. 激光与红外, 2020, 50(5): 551-556.
Li Yunhong, Wen Da, Li Honghao, et al. Study on the influence of coal sample height on the accuracy of laser measurement of coal ash content[J]. Laser and Infrared, 2020, 50(5): 551-556.
[8]张蕊, 孙兰香, 陈彤, 等. 基于激光诱导击穿光谱技术的岩石表面指纹图谱分析及分类方法[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(3): 991-998.
Zhang Rui, Sun Lanxiang, Chen Tong, et al. Fingerprint analysis and classification of rock surface based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(3): 991-998.
[9]Shu R, Qi H, Lv G, et al. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy based detection of lunar soil simulants for moon exploration[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2007, 5(1): 58-59.
[10]刘宪云, 王振亚, 郝立庆, 等. 激光诱导击穿光谱在生物医学中的应用[J]. 激光技术, 2008, 32(2): 134-136.
Liu Xianyun, Wang Zhenya, Hao Liqing, et al. Application of laser induced breakdown spectroscopy technology in biomedicine field[J]. Laser Technology, 2008, 32(2): 134-136.
[11]李晨毓, 曲亮, 高飞, 等. 激光诱导击穿光谱对金属陶瓷文物成分的表面及深度分布分析[J]. 中国光学, 2020, 13(6): 1239-1248.
LI Chenyu, Qu Liang, Gao Fei, et al. Composition analysis of the surface and depth distribution of metal and ceramic cultural relics by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Optics, 2020, 13(6): 1239-1248.
[12]Rauschenbach I, Lazic V, Pavlov S G, et al. Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy on soils and rocks: Influence of the sample temperature, moisture and roughness[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2008, 63(10): 1205-1215.
[13]Tsuyuki K, Miura S, Idris N, et al. Measurement of concrete strength using the emission intensity ratio between Ca(II) 396.8 nm and Ca(I) 422.6 nm in a Nd: YAG laser-induced plasma[J]. Applied Spectroscopy, 2006, 60(1): 61-64.
[14]Aberkane S M, Bendib A, Yahiaoui K, et al. Correlation between Fe-V-C alloys surface hardness and plasma temperature via LIBS technique[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 301(19): 225-229.
[15]Huang J, Dong M, Lu S, et al. Estimation of the mechanical properties of steel via LIBS combined with canonical correlationanalysis(CCA) and support vector regression(SVR)[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33(5): 720-729.
[16]Elfaham M M, Alnozahy A M, Ashmawy A. Comparative study of LIBS and mechanically evaluated hardness of graphite/rubber composites[J]. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2018, 207: 30-35.
[17]陈凭, 王希林, 周伟才, 等. 硅橡胶表面硬度的激光诱导击穿光谱分析[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(4): 1315-1321.
Chen Ping, Wang Xilin, Zhou Weicai, et al. Measurement of surface hardness of silicone rubber via laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(4): 1315-1321.
[18]Momcilovic M, Petrovic J, Ciganovic J, et al. Laser-induced plasma as a method for the metallic materials hardness estimation: An alternative approach[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2020, 40(2): 499-510.
[19]Li J, Lu J, Dai Y, et al. Correlation between aging grade of T91 steel and spectral characteristics of the laser-induced plasma[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 346: 302-310.
[20]薛博文, 崔敏超, 汪晨旭, 等. 基于激光技术区分不同金相组织的研究[J]. 激光技术, 2018, 42(6): 806-810.
Xue Bowen, Cui Minchao, Wang Chenxu, et al. Distinguishing different metallographic structures based on laser technology[J]. Laser Technology, 2018, 42(6): 806-810.
[21]Stavropoulos P, Palagas C, Angelopoulos G N, et al. Calibration measurements in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using nanosecond and picosecond lasers[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2004, 59(12): 1885-1892.
[22]Aragón C, Aguilera J A. Characterization of laser induced plasmas by optical emission spectroscopy: A review of experiments andmethods[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2008, 63(9): 893-916.
[23]NIST atomic spectra database linesdata[DB/OL]. https: //physics. nist. gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form. html
[24]Milan M, Laserna J J. Diagnostics of silicon plasmas produced by visible nanosecond laser ablation[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2001, 56(3): 275-288.
[25]Wu R, Li Y, Zhu S G, et al. Emission spectroscopy diagnostics of plasma electron temperature[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2008, 28(4): 731-735.
[26]Konjević N, Wiese W L. Experimental stark widths and shifts for spectral lines of neutral and ionized atoms[J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1990, 19(6): 1307-1385.
[27]李俊彦, 陆继东, 李军, 等. 不同硬度受热面材料的激光诱导等离子体光谱特性分析[J]. 中国激光, 2011, 38(8): 0815002.
Li Junyan, Lu Jidong, Li Jun, et al. Laser-induced plasma spectra of heating surface materials with different hardnesses[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2011, 38(8): 0815002.

基于激光诱导击穿光谱表征GCr15钢的硬度

Characterization of hardness for GCr15 steel based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李立, 曾艳, 吴晓春. 4Cr5Mo2VCo钢的热处理工艺优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 133-140.
[2]	王方军, 王东哲, 万红, 时瑶, 沈涛. 热处理和冷变形量对定膨胀合金4J32C线膨胀系数的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 199-203.
[3]	王绍灼, 孟晗, 王芬, 樊海卫, 李燕, 唐超. 改善低氧TC4-LC及重熔TC4钛合金性能的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 204-207.
[4]	苏勇, 王帅, 王吉星, 于兴福, 刘洪秀, 刘金玲. 复合化学热处理对G13Cr4Mo4Ni4V钢组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 226-230.
[5]	王敬元, 吴松全, 张博华, 辛社伟, 杨义, 王皞, 黄爱军. 固溶时效处理对BT25y钛合金显微组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 14-19.
[6]	樊洋, 杨明华, 陈凯敏, 孙丙岩. 焊后热处理对31CrMoV9钢电子束焊接接头组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 57-60.
[7]	陈善勇, 王快社, 乔柯, 王文. 碱热处理对搅拌摩擦加工AZ31镁合金耐腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 61-66.
[8]	冯锐, 李利连, 帖锦芳, 侯嘉强, 米奕媛. 高温形变热处理对20CrMnTiH钢锻件组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 72-76.
[9]	方秀荣, 刘留, 徐慧慧, 高扬. 渗碳前预热处理对17CrNiMo6钢制齿轮轴畸变的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 113-118.
[10]	张颖, 王浩军, 陈素明, 胡广, 欧阳德来, 崔霞, 胡生双. 热处理对激光立体成形TB18钛合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 124-129.
[11]	海侠女, 杨扬, 黄太伟, 范王展, 桂伟民, 何亮亮. 淬透性细化分级8620H钢的热处理性能研究[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 155-158.
[12]	龙亮, 胡齐贤, 罗云, 郑红祥, 王玉杰. 大型焊接容器局部热处理防畸变工装优化设计[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 234-238.
[13]	崔鼎, 车永平. 带内花键零件的畸变控制方法[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 252-256.
[14]	董瑞, 陈林, 岑耀东, 包喜荣. 不同热处理条件下贝氏体钢的微观组织和疲劳裂纹扩展[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 153-158.
[15]	禹鑫磊, 郑小平, 曹通, 田亚强, 陈连生. 等温温度对轧制SIMA法制备7075合金半固态显微组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 164-167.