退火过程中无取向电工钢的晶粒长大行为及磁性能演变

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.08.020

金属热处理 ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 123-128.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.08.020

退火过程中无取向电工钢的晶粒长大行为及磁性能演变

郭文一^1,2, 焦海涛^1,2, 谢信祥^1,2, 赵龙志^1,2, 赵明娟^1,2, 胡勇^1,2

1.华东交通大学南昌市载运工具先进材料与激光增材制造重点实验室, 江西南昌 330013;
2.华东交通大学材料科学与工程学院, 江西南昌 330013

收稿日期:2022-03-23 修回日期:2022-06-20 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-09-19
通讯作者: 焦海涛,讲师,博士,E-mail:andrewjiao@163.com
作者简介:郭文一(2000—),男,学士,主要研究方向为电工钢性能,E-mail:1816231493@qq.com。
基金资助:
江西省教育厅青年基金(GJJ190349);大学生创新创业训练计划(1500420013)

Grain growth behavior and magnetic property evolution of non-oriented electrical steel during annealing

Guo Wenyi^1,2, Jiao Haitao^1,2, Xie Xinxiang^1,2, Zhao Longzhi^1,2, Zhao Mingjuan^1,2, Hu Yong^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials for Vehicles & Laser Additive Manufacturing of Nanchang City, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang Jiangxi 330013, China;
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang Jiangxi 330013, China

Received:2022-03-23 Revised:2022-06-20 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-09-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对Fe-3%Si无取向电工钢冷轧板进行不同时间的退火处理,利用光学显微镜、EBSD等研究了退火过程的晶粒长大行为及其对磁性能的影响。结果表明,随着退火时间的增加,退火板中Goss以及γ织构晶粒占比降低,{114}<841>以及{001}<120>织构晶粒占比增大。在退火时间低于20 s时,退火织构以强γ和Goss织构为主。退火时间为60 s时,{001}<120>织构晶粒长大速率急剧增大,平均晶粒尺寸达到约105 μm。退火时间达到240 s时,退火织构以强{001}<120>以及{114}<841>织构为主。退火时间为30～60 s时轧向及横向磁感值迅速增大,60 s时轧向磁感达到最大值1.74 T,120 s时横向磁感达到最大值1.67 T,之后随着退火时间增加而轻微降低,并分别稳定在1.72 T和1.66 T左右。退火板45°方向磁感值先升高后降低,20 s时达到最大值1.67 T。各方向的铁损值均随退火时间的增加而降低,且磁各向异性逐渐减小。

关键词: 无取向电工钢, 退火时间, 晶粒长大, 织构, 磁性能

Abstract: Cold rolled Fe-3%Si non-oriented electrical steel sheet was annealed for different time. The grain growth behavior and magnetic properties evolution of the non-oriented electrical steel during annealing were investigated by optical microscope, EBSD and so on. The results indicate that the proportion of Goss and γ texture grains decreases with the increase of annealing time, while the proportion of {114}<841> and {001}<120> texture grains increases gradually. When the annealing time is lower than 20 s, the recrystallization texture is characterized by strong γ and Goss textures. When annealed for 60 s, the growth rate of {001}<120> texture grains increases sharply, and the average grain size reaches about 105 μm. When the annealing time is 240 s, the annealing texture is mainly strong {001}<120> and {114}<841> textures. The magnetic induction intensity along RD and TD rises rapidly during annealing for 30-60 s, and the value along RD reaches the maximum of 1.74 T at 60 s, and value along TD reaches the maximum of 1.67 T at 120 s. After that, the magnetic induction intensity decreases slightly with the increase of annealing time and stabilizes at about 1.72 T (RD) and 1.66 T (TD), respectively. The magnetic induction intensity along the 45° direction increases first and then decreases, reaching the maximum value of 1.67 T at 20 s. The iron loss along each direction decreases with the increase of annealing time, and the magnetic anisotropy also decreases gradually.

Key words: non-oriented electrical steel, annealing time, grain growth, texture, magnetic properties

中图分类号:

TG113

郭文一, 焦海涛, 谢信祥, 赵龙志, 赵明娟, 胡勇. 退火过程中无取向电工钢的晶粒长大行为及磁性能演变[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 123-128.

Guo Wenyi, Jiao Haitao, Xie Xinxiang, Zhao Longzhi, Zhao Mingjuan, Hu Yong. Grain growth behavior and magnetic property evolution of non-oriented electrical steel during annealing[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(8): 123-128.

参考文献

[1]Lee K M, Park S Y, Huh M Y, et al. Effect of texture and grain size on magnetic flux density and core loss in non-oriented electrical steel containing 3.15%Si[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2014, 354: 324-332.
[2]何忠治, 赵宇, 罗海文. 电工钢[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2012.
[3]顾晨, 杨平, 毛为民. 轧制工艺对低牌号无取向电工钢相变退火组织、织构与磁性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(2): 182-190.
Gu Chen, Yang Ping, Mao Weimin. The influence of rolling process on the microstructure, texture and magnetic properties of low grades non-oriented electrical steel after phase transformation annealing[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2019, 55(2): 182-190.
[4]刘献东, 王波, 朱简如, 等. 宝钢无取向电工钢发展历程及生产技术进步[J]. 电工材料, 2014(5): 41-48.
Liu Xiandong, Wang Bo, Zhu Jianru, et al. Development history and technological progress of non-oriented electrical steel sheets at Baosteel[J]. Electrical Engineering Materials, 2014(5): 41-48.
[5]孔祥兵, 任慧平, 金自力, 等. 退火温度对新能源汽车用含 Ce无取向电工钢组织和织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(2): 150-153.
Kong Xiangbing, Ren Huiping, Jin Zili, et al. Effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and texture of Ce-bearing non-oriented electrical steel for new energy automobiles[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(2): 150-153.
[6]张文康, 毛卫民, 白志浩. 退火温度对冷轧无取向硅钢组织结构和磁性能的影响[J]. 特殊钢, 2006, 27(1): 15-17.
Zhang Wenkang, Mao Weimin, Bai Zhihao. Influence of annealing temperature on structure, texture and magnetic properties of cold rolled non-oriented silicon steel[J]. Special Steel, 2006, 27(1): 15-17.
[7]李赛, 樊立峰, 刘书明, 等. 无取向电工钢 50W350 的组织及织构[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(11): 59-61.
Li Sai, Fan Lifeng, Liu Shuming, et al. Microstructure and texture of non-oriented electrical steel 50W350[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(11): 59-61.
[8]Jiao H T, Xu Y B, Xiong W, et al. High-permeability and thin-gauge non-oriented electrical steel through twin-roll strip casting[J]. Materials and Design, 2017, 136: 23-33.
[9]Park J T, Szpunar J A S. Evolution of recrystallization texture in nonoriented electrical steels[J]. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51(11): 3037-3051.
[10]Zhang Y X, Lan M F, Wang Y, et al. Microstructure and texture evolution of thin-gauge non-oriented silicon steel with high permeability produced by twin-roll strip casting[J]. Materials Characterization, 2019, 150: 118-127.
[11]Sha Y H, Sun C, Zhang F, et al. Strong cube recrystallization texture in silicon steel by twin-roll casting process[J]. Acta Materialia, 2014, 76: 106-117.
[12]Zu G Q, Zhang X M, Zhao J W, et al. Analysis of {411}<148> recrystallization texture in twin-roll strip casting of 4.5wt%Si non-oriented electrical steel[J]. Materials Letters, 2016, 180: 63-67.
[13]Humphreys J, Rohrer G S, Rollett A. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena[M]. Third Ed. Netherlands: Elsevier, 2017.
[14]Diween H, Soran B. Disparity in recrystallization of α-& γ-fibers and its impact on Cube texture formation in non-oriented electrical steel[J]. Acta Materialia, 2021, 216: 117141.
[15]Ghosh P, Chromik R R, Vaseghi B, et al. Effect of crystallographic texture on the bulk magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2014, 365: 14-22. [16]Leuning N, Steentjes S, Hameyer K. Effect of grain size and magnetic texture on iron-loss components in NO electrical steel at different frequencies[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2019, 469: 373-382.
[17]Houbaert Y, Yanez T R, Monsalve A, et al. Texture evolution in experimental grades of high-silicon electrical steel[J]. Physica B, 2006, 384: 310-312.
[18]Kim J K, Lee D N, Koo Y M. The evolution of the Goss and Cube textures in electrical steel[J]. Materials Letters, 2014, 122: 110-113.
[19]Takajo S, Merriman C C, Vogel S C, et al. In-situ EBSD study on the cube texture evolution in 3wt%Si steel complemented by ex-situ EBSD experiment—From nucleation to grain growth[J]. Acta Materialia, 2019, 166: 100-112.
[20]Jiao H T, Xu Y B, Zhao L Z, et al. Texture evolution in twin-roll strip cast non-oriented electrical steel with strong Cube and Goss texture[J]. Acta Materialia, 2020, 199: 311-325.
[21]Fang F, Zhang Y X, Lu X, et al. Abnormal growth of {100} grains and strong Cube texture in strip cast Fe-Si electrical steel[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2018, 147: 33-36.

退火过程中无取向电工钢的晶粒长大行为及磁性能演变

Grain growth behavior and magnetic property evolution of non-oriented electrical steel during annealing

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡耕辅, 田玉新, 朱银存, 陆建生, 王福明. 耐蚀软磁合金FeCr16中σ相的析出行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 83-87.
[2]	孙浩, 宋文乐, 王磊, 薛志勇, 詹花茂. 新型Fe_72.7Si₁₇B_6.8Nb_2.6Cu_0.9纳米晶铁芯的磁场热处理工艺与软磁性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 81-85.
[3]	宿鹏吉, 麻永林, 董丽丽, 温铠, 罗家豪, 刘宝志. 磁场预退火对取向硅钢二次再结晶组织及织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(5): 131-135.
[4]	宿鹏吉, 麻永林, 董丽丽, 杨雪峰. 磁场预退火处理对CGO钢组织与织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 128-132.
[5]	章建军, 庄晓伟, 汤晓峰. 提高低碳钢磁性能的球化退火工艺试验[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 182-184.
[6]	余世伦, 张孝军, 孔玢, 刘正乔, 余伟, 蒋孟玲. 退火工艺对冷轧工业纯钛带卷各向异性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 82-87.
[7]	张世进, 李凯, 易丹青, 刘会群. 冷轧TA5钛合金退火过程的再结晶行为及织构演变[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 1-8.
[8]	董丽丽, 麻永林, 宿鹏吉, 杨雪峰. 脉冲磁场热处理对CGO取向硅钢脱碳退火过程中组织和织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 31-34.
[9]	杨劼, 任慧平, 刘宗昌. 15Cr12CuSiMoMn钢的奥氏体晶粒长大动力学[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 53-58.
[10]	许峰, 肖颖, 陈前, 邓长春, 孙晓寒. 冷轧压下率对IF钢微结构、织构及深冲性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 250-254.
[11]	王自敏, 杨志强, 胡芳忠, 汪开忠, 丁雷. Nb微合金化对18CrNiMo7-6钢奥氏体晶粒长大的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 53-57.
[12]	蒋莺鸽, 黄继武, 江福清, 许成龙. 冷轧方式和退火温度对Al-4Cu-0.73Mg合金织构和微观组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 58-64.
[13]	宫浩, 孔德斌, 郭立娜, 韩洪文, 宫晶晶, 房洪杰. 中间退火处理对AlMgSiCu铝合金冷轧板组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 129-132.
[14]	蒙曰睿, 赵贤平, 周博文. 基于铁素体轧制工艺低碳铝镇静钢板r值降低原因分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 211-215.
[15]	秦春, 李宁, 董福元, 李涌泉. Ti-22Al-27Nb合金的晶粒长大行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 42-45.