热喷涂工艺对NiCrFeAl/hBN复合涂层性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.06.039

金属热处理 ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 208-215.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.06.039

热喷涂工艺对NiCrFeAl/hBN复合涂层性能的影响

周子民¹, 熊声健², 陈皓晖³, 李彰¹, 王长亮¹, 郭孟秋¹, 崔秀芳², 金国²

1.中国航发北京航空材料研究院航空材料先进腐蚀与防护航空科技重点实验室, 北京 100095;
2.哈尔滨工程大学材料科学与化学工程学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001;
3.中国人民解放军32382部队, 北京 100072

收稿日期:2022-01-03 修回日期:2022-05-06 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-07-05
通讯作者: 熊声健,硕士研究生,E-mail:15776948015@163.com
作者简介:周子民(1988—),男,博士,主要研究方向为材料表面处理及防护,E-mail:haoliangtian@163.com。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2017-VII-0012-0109);国家自然科学基金(52075508);北京市科技新星培养计划(Z191100001119040)

Effect of thermal spraying process on properties of NiCrFeAl/hBN composite coating

Zhou Zimin¹, Xiong Shengjian², Chen Haohui³, Li Zhang¹, Wang Changliang¹, Guo Mengqiu¹, Cui Xiufang², Jin Guo²

1. Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on advanced Corrosion and Protection for Aviation Material, AECC Beijing Institution of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China.;
2. College of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin Heilongjiang 150001, China;
3. Unit 32382 of the PLA, Beijing 100072, China

Received:2022-01-03 Revised:2022-05-06 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提升氧乙炔火焰喷涂NiCrFeAl/hBN复合涂层的力学性能,对氧乙炔火焰喷涂的氧燃比、喷枪速度及喷涂间距等3个主要参数,采用L₉(3⁴)正交试验方法,以涂层的表面洛氏硬度和结合强度性能为主要判定指标分析了不同工艺参数的影响主次关系,对最优工艺制备涂层性能进行了验证。结果表明,喷涂间距是影响涂层性能的主要因素,最优工艺参数为氧燃比(O₂/C₂H₂)26/20,枪速600 mm/s,间距12 mm,涂层内部组织更为均匀、熔融结合较好,表面平整、未熔颗粒较少,涂层平均结合强度高达10.3 MPa,表面平均洛氏硬度为54.9 HR15Y。

关键词: 氧乙炔火焰喷涂, NiCrFeAl/hBN涂层, 正交试验, 表面洛氏硬度, 结合强度

Abstract: In order to improve the mechanical properties of oxyacetylene flame sprayed NiCrFeAl/hBN composite coating, L₉(3⁴) orthogonal test method was used and taking the surface Rockwell hardness and bonding strength as the main judgment indexes, the influence order of the three main parameters (oxygen-fuel ratio, spraying speed, spraying spacing) of oxyacetylene flame spraying were analyzed, and the performance of the coating prepared by the optimal process was verified. The results show that the spraying spacing is the main factor affecting the performance of the coating, and the optimal process parameters are O₂/C₂H₂ of 26/20, spraying speed of 600 mm/s, spraying spacing of 12 mm, which lead to more uniform internal structure of the coating, better melting bonding, smooth surface, less unmelted particles, and the average bonding strength of the coating is up to 10.3 MPa, the average surface Rockwell hardness is 54.9 HR15Y.

Key words: oxyacetylene flame spraying, NiCrFeAl/hBN coating, orthogonal test, surface Rockwell hardness, bonding strength

中图分类号:

TG174.4

周子民, 熊声健, 陈皓晖, 李彰, 王长亮, 郭孟秋, 崔秀芳, 金国. 热喷涂工艺对NiCrFeAl/hBN复合涂层性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 208-215.

Zhou Zimin, Xiong Shengjian, Chen Haohui, Li Zhang, Wang Changliang, Guo Mengqiu, Cui Xiufang, Jin Guo. Effect of thermal spraying process on properties of NiCrFeAl/hBN composite coating[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(6): 208-215.

参考文献

[1]赵丹, 赵忠兴, 杨景伟, 等. 封严涂层的性能评价及研究进展[J]. 航空科学技术, 2011, 23(4): 17-20.
Zhao Dan, Zhao Zhongxing, Yang Jingwei, et al. Performance evaluation and research progress of seal coatings[J]. Aeronautical Science and Technology, 2011, 23(4): 17-20.
[2]Yang S Y, Guo D, Cheng W X, et al. Corrosion behavior of NiCrFeAl-hBN seal coatings in oxidation environments at a high temperature[J]. Rare Metals, 2021, 40(1): 212-218.
[3]Hnston R E. Mechanical characterisation of AlSi-hBN, NiCrAl-bentonite and NiCrAl-bentonite-hBN freestanding abradable coatings[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2011, 205(10): 3268-3273.
[4]吴庆丹, 刘黎明, 徐海峰, 等. 火焰喷涂和等离子喷涂FeCrBSi涂层及其防滑和耐磨性能研究[J]. 表面技术, 2017, 46(7): 104-109.
Wu Qingdan, Liu Liming, Xu Haifeng, et al. Flame sprayed and atmospheric plasma sprayed FeCrBSi coatings and their skid and wear resistance[J]. Surface Technology, 2017, 46(7): 104-109.
[5]运广涛, 李其连, 程旭东. NiCrAlYSi/h-BN高温可磨耗封严涂层摩擦磨损性能研究[J]. 表面技术, 2016, 45(2): 103-108.
Yun Guangtao, Li Qilian, Cheng Xudong. Friction and wear properties of NiCrAlYSi/h-BN high-temperature abradable seal coatings[J]. Surface Technology, 2016, 45(2): 103-108.
[6]Rhys-Jones T N. Thermally sprayed coating systems for surface protection and clearance control applications in aero engines[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 1990, 43(1): 402-415.
[7]蔡宏图, 江涛, 周勇. 热喷涂技术的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 装备制造技术, 2014, 42(6): 28-32.
Cai Hongtu, Jiang Tao, Zhou Yong. Research status and development of the thermal spray technology[J]. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 42(6): 28-32.
[8]侯伟骜, 沈婕, 魏伟, 等. 一种可磨耗封严涂层制备及性能研究[J]. 热喷涂技术, 2010, 2(2): 37-41.
Hou Weiao, Shen Jie, Wei Wei, et al. Preparation and property study of flame sprayed an abradable sealing coating[J]. Thermal Spray Technology, 2010, 2(2): 37-41.
[9]徐滨士, 马士宁, 刘家浚. 表面工程的现状和发展(下)[J]. 中国设备管理, 1991(4): 37-38, 12.
[10]陈凌云. 航空发动机新型可磨耗封严涂层耐热蚀性能研究[D]. 北京: 北京科技大学, 2018.
[11]李俊. 基于复合表面强化技术的Ni60/WC涂层组织与性能研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2016.
[12]Friis M, Persson C, Wigren J. Influence of particle in-flight characteristics on the microstructure of atmospheric plasma sprayed yttria stabilized ZrO₂[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2001, 141(2): 115-127.
[13]吴艳鹏, 魏剑辉, 李文戈, 等. 铝合金表面等离子喷涂Al₂O₃-3%TiO₂复合涂层工艺参数优化的研究[J]. 表面技术, 2019, 48(6): 322-331.
Wu Yanpeng, Wei Jianhui, Li Wenge, et al. Optimization of plasma spraying process parameters for Al₂O₃-3%TiO₂ composite coating on aluminum alloy[J]. Surface Technology, 2019, 48(6): 322-331.
[14]王娜, 王全胜, 王富耻. 等离子喷涂ZrO₂热障涂层工艺参数优化设计[J]. 中国表面工程, 2004, 17(3): 13-16.
Wang Na, Wang Quansheng, Wang Fuzhi. Process optimization of ZrO₂ thermal barrier coating by plasma spraying[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2004, 17(3): 13-16.
[15]华绍春, 王汉功, 汪刘应, 等. 微弧等离子喷涂AT13纳米涂层的工艺优化[J]. 无机材料学报, 2007, 22(3): 560-564.
Hua Shaochun, Wang Hangong, Wang Liuying, et al. Optimization of the process parameters of nanostructured AT13 coatings prepared by micro-plasma spraying[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2007, 22(3): 560-564.
[16]吴九岭, 李增喜, 张伟刚. 镍/石墨复合粉体及其热喷涂涂层新材料[J]. 过程工程学报, 2007, 32(6): 1221-1228.
Wu Jiuling, Li Zengxi, Zhang Weigang. A novel Ni/C composite powder and its derived thermal sprayed coating[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2007, 32(6): 1221-1228.
[17]吴贵生. 试验设计与数据处理[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版, 1997.
[18]王东生, 田宗军, 王松林, 等. 正交试验设计优化等离子喷涂纳米Al₂O₃-13%TiO₂涂层工艺参数[J]. 材料导报, 2012, 26(2): 80-82, 89.
Wang Dongsheng, Tian Zongjun, Wang Songlin, et al. Process parameters optimization of plasma-sprayed nanostructured Al₂O₃-13%TiO₂ coating by an orthogonal array method[J]. Material Review, 2012, 26(2): 80-82, 89.
[19]高俊国, 陆峰, 汤智慧, 等. 氧燃充枪比对爆炸喷涂CoCrAlYTa涂层组织和性能的影响[J]. 航空材料学报, 2013, 33(2): 29-34.
Gao Junguo, Lu Feng, Tang Zhihui, et al. Influence of oxygen/fuel in-gun ratio on structure and properties of CoCrAlYTa coating prepared by detonation gun spraying[J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2013, 33(2): 29-34.
[20]赵立英, 李国太, 吴清军, 等. 氧燃比对爆炸喷涂WC-12Co涂层组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2016, 45(1): 131-136.
Zhao Liying, Li Guotai, Wu Qingjun, et al. Effect of oxygen-fuel ratio on the microstructure and mechanical properties of WC-12Co coating deposited by detonation spraying method[J]. Surface Technology, 2016, 45(1): 131-136.
[21]王璇. 活塞裙表面等离子喷涂钼涂层的研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏科技大学, 2015.
[22]段忠清, 张宝霞, 王泽华. 等离子喷涂Cr₂O₃-8%TiO₂涂层参数优化研究[J]. 表面技术, 2008, 37(4): 39-41, 53.
Duan Zhongqing, Zhang Baoxia, Wang Zehua. Process optimization of plasma sprayed Cr₂O₃-8%TiO₂ coating[J]. Surface Technology, 2008, 37(4): 39-41, 53.
[23]王犇, 曹居正, 马翔, 等. 乙炔燃爆特性的研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2012, 12(3): 168-171.
Wang Ben, Cao Juzheng, Ma Xiang, et al. Study of the characteristic features of the acetylene explosives[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2012, 12(3): 168-171.
[24]Park S Y, Kim M C, Park C G. Mechanical properties and microstructure evolution of the nano WC-Co coatings fabricated by detonation gun spraying with post heat treatment[J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2006, 449(2): 894-897.
[25]Hao D, Hua W, Liu J, et al. Influence of process variables on the qualities of detonation gun sprayed WC-Co coatings[J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2005, 408(1): 202-210.
[26]赵立英, 刘平安. 氧燃比对爆炸喷涂碳化钨涂层结构和性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2016, 44(6): 50-55.
Zhao Liying, Liu Pingan. Effects of oxygen-fuel ratio on structure and property of detonation gun sprayed WC coating[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2016, 44(6): 50-55.

热喷涂工艺对NiCrFeAl/hBN复合涂层性能的影响

Effect of thermal spraying process on properties of NiCrFeAl/hBN composite coating

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卢庆亮, 王静, 戚小霞, 李燕乐, 李方义. 面向盾构机密封跑道修复的激光熔覆Fe基涂层制备工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 202-211.
[2]	邵春娟, 镇凡, 曲锦波, 雒广杰. 热变形参数对316L/Q370qE复合板结合强度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(5): 132-137.
[3]	李健, 冯再新, 左森, 姚宇康, 郭小森. 采用正交试验优化Cu-Ni-Sn合金的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(3): 61-66.
[4]	丛相州, 彭杏娜, 彭先宽, 王涛, 陈正宗, 姜海峰, 李传永, 张书迎. G115钢大口径管件的热处理[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(3): 90-95.
[5]	闫献国, 李帆, 陈峙, 姚永超. 镐型截齿深冷工艺的多目标优化模型[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(2): 95-99.
[6]	卢春光, 梅国俊, 林生秀, 钱才让, 李杨, 芦晓雪. 3379BA1汽轮机叶片钢的热处理工艺优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(11): 199-201.
[7]	李海涛, 张蕾涛, 夏慧芸, 戴姣燕, 徐金富. 45钢表面激光碳合金化层的组织与性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(10): 237-241.
[8]	刘瑞霞, 郭锋, 韩海鹏. 铬过渡层对氮化铬/镁合金膜基界面结合强度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(1): 143-148.
[9]	张家元, 李苹, 曾祺. 真气垫炉内漂浮换热过程数值模拟及结构优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(9): 248-256.
[10]	朱伶俐, 李云, 刘慧, 吕正风, 余琨. In对Al-Mg-Ga-Sn-(In)铝合金阳极组织及电化学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(7): 159-162.
[11]	薛维华, 连亚鹏, 魏海莲, 毛云龙, 施应伟, 王浩. 高温预冷淬火工艺对中碳铌微合金钢性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(1): 16-19.
[12]	陈胜川, 蔡国帅, 朱宝辉, 马乐, 王璐. 扩散退火和热轧温度对钛铜界面结合强度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(1): 126-129.
[13]	杨文静，王赫，丛培武，周新宇，徐跃明. 翅片管换热器的结构优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2017, 42(4): 208-211.
[14]	孔永华，李思贝，周江龙，朱世根. 等温淬火工艺对GCr15钢领组织和耐磨性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2016, 41(7): 95-99.
[15]	李树飞1,2，尹登峰1,2,3，余鑫祥1,2. 新型Al-Cu-Li-Ag-Mg-Zr-Ce合金的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2016, 41(4): 127-132.