两种冶炼工艺下A286高温合金的热变形行为

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.12.010

金属热处理 ›› 2021, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 61-71.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.12.010

两种冶炼工艺下A286高温合金的热变形行为

邓闪闪^1,2, 孙永庆², 蒋业华¹, 刘振宝², 梁剑雄², 王长军²

1.昆明理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 云南昆明 650093;
2.钢铁研究总院特殊钢研究所, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2021-09-15 出版日期:2021-12-25 发布日期:2022-02-18
通讯作者: 蒋业华,教授,博士,E-mail:jiangyehua@ kmust.edu.cn
作者简介:邓闪闪(1994—),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为金属基耐磨复合材料,E-mail:dss2697@163.com。

Hot deformation behavior of A286 superalloy with two different smelting processes

Deng Shanshan^1,2, Sun Yongqing², Jiang Yehua¹, Liu Zhenbao², Liang Jianxiong², Wang Changjun²

1. Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming Yunnan 650093, China;
2. Research Institute of Special Steels, Center Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2021-09-15 Online:2021-12-25 Published:2022-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究真空感应+真空自耗(VIM+VAR)和电炉+精炼+真空自耗(EAF+LF+VAR)两种工艺冶炼A286高温合金的热变形行为,利用Gleeble-3800热模拟试验机在温度950~1150 ℃和应变速率0.01~10 s^-1范围内进行热压缩试验。基于摩擦和绝热加热修正后的真应力-真应变曲线和应变硬化率曲线建立了A286合金的Arrhenius本构方程,确定了VIM+VAR合金和EAF+LF+VAR合金的热激活能分别为358.15和372.54 kJ·mol^-1。利用临界应变和动态再结晶体积分数50%应变引入动态再结晶速度参数k_v,建立新的动态再结晶模型。采用Prasad 准则绘制两种钢在应变0.2、0.5和0.9下的热加工图,并结合组织分析,确定VIM+VAR合金的最佳热加工工艺条件为1050~1100 ℃,0.01~1 s^-1和1100~1150 ℃,0.1~10 s^-1;EAF+LF+VAR合金的最佳热加工工艺条件为1050~1100 ℃,0.01~1 s^-1和1100~1150 ℃,0.1~3 s^-1,得出VIM+VAR合金的热加工区间较宽,其热加工性能优于EAF+LF+VAR合金。

关键词: A286高温合金, 热变形, 本构方程, 动态再结晶, 热加工图

Abstract: In order to investigate the hot deformation behavior of A286 superalloy with two smelting processes of VIM+VAR (vacuum induction melting+vacuum arc remelting) and EAF+LF+VAR (electric arc furnace+ladle furnace+vacuum arc remelting), hot compression tests were carried out on a Gleeble-3800 hot simulation test machine at temperatures ranging from 950 to 1150 ℃ and strain rates ranging from 0.01 to 10 s^-1. The Arrhenius constitutive equations of the A286 alloy are established based on the true stress-true strain curves and work hardening rate curves modified by friction and adiabatic heating. The hot deformation activation energies of the VIM+VAR alloy and the EAF+LF+VAR alloy are determined to be 358.15 and 372.54 kJ·mol^-1, respectively. A new dynamic recrystallization model is established by introducing the dynamic recrystallization velocity parameter k_v with critical strain and 50% dynamic recrystallization volume fraction strain. Prasad criterion is used to draw the hot processing maps at 0.2, 0.5 and 0.9 strain of the A286 alloy prepared by the two smelting processes. Combined with the microstructure analysis, the optimal hot working conditions of the VIM+VAR alloy is 1050-1100 ℃, 0.01-1 s^-1 and 1100-1150 ℃, 0.1-10 s^-1, while that of the EAF+LF+VAR alloy is 1050-1100 ℃, 0.01-1 s^-1 and 1100-1150 ℃, 0.1-3 s^-1. It is concluded that the VIM+VAR alloy has a wider hot-working range and its hot-working performance is better than that of the EAF+LF+VAR alloy.

Key words: A286 superalloy, hot deformation, constitutive equation, dynamic recrystallization, hot processing map

中图分类号:

TF764

邓闪闪, 孙永庆, 蒋业华, 刘振宝, 梁剑雄, 王长军. 两种冶炼工艺下A286高温合金的热变形行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(12): 61-71.

Deng Shanshan, Sun Yongqing, Jiang Yehua, Liu Zhenbao, Liang Jianxiong, Wang Changjun. Hot deformation behavior of A286 superalloy with two different smelting processes[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(12): 61-71.

参考文献

[1]Panahi M H, Pirali H. Experimental study of high temperature fracture behavior of A286 superalloy at 650 ℃[J]. Physical Mesomechanics, 2018, 21(2): 157-164.
[2]Esfandiari M, Dong H. Improving the surface properties of A286 precipitation-hardening stainless steel by low-temperature plasma nitriding[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2007, 201(14): 6189-6196.
[3]Wan Z, Hu L, Yu S, et al. Hot deformation behavior and processing workability of a Ni-based alloy[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018, 769: 367-375.
[4]Ebrahimi R. A new method for evaluation of friction in bulk metal forming[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 152(2): 136-143.
[5]Chi Z, Zhang L, Shen W, et al. Study on constitutive modeling and processing maps for hot deformation of medium carbon Cr-Ni-Mo alloyed steel[J]. Materials and Design, 2016, 90: 804-814.
[6]Favre J, Koizumi Y, Chiba A, et al. Deformation behavior and dynamic recrystallization of biomedical Co-Cr-W-Ni (L-605) alloy[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2013, 44(6): 2819-2830.
[7]Poliak E I, Jonas J J. A one-parameter approach to determining the critical conditions for the initiation of dynamic recrystallization[J]. Acta Materialia, 1996, 44(1): 127-136.
[8]Zhang D, Zhang D, Zhang Y, et al. Analysis of strain hardening behavior in a ductile Mg-Yb based alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2021, 819(6374): 141462.
[9]Sahoo S K, Dhinwal S S, Vu V Q, et al. A new macroscopic strain hardening function based on microscale crystal plasticity and its application in polycrystal modeling[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2021, 823: 141634.
[10]Li C M, Liang H, Zhao M J, et al. Influence of hot deformation on dynamic recrystallization behavior of 300M steel: Rules and modeling[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2020, 797: 139925.
[11]Zener C, Hollomon J H. Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1944, 15(1): 22-32.
[12]Shaban M, Eghbali B. Determination of critical conditions for dynamic recrystallization of a microalloyed steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2010, 527(16-17): 4320-4325.
[13]Liu J, Cui Z, Ruan L. A new kinetics model of dynamic recrystallization for magnesium alloy AZ31B[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2011, 529: 300-310.
[14]Bergstr M Y . A dislocation model for the stress-strain behaviour of polycrystalline α-Fe with special emphasis on the variation of the densities of mobile and immobile dislocations[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 1970, 5(4): 193-200.
[15]Prasad Y, Gegel H L, Doraivelu S M, et al. Modeling of dynamic material behavior in hot deformation: Forging of Ti-6242 [J]. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1984, 15(10): 1883-1892.
[16]Babu K A, Mandal S, Kumar A, et al. Characterization of hot deformation behavior of alloy 617 through kinetic analysis, dynamic material modeling and microstructural studies[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2016, 664: 177-187.
[17]Sajjadi S A, Chaichi A, Ezatpour H R, et al. Hot deformation processing map and microstructural evaluation of the Ni-based superalloy IN-738LC[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2016, 25(4): 1269-1275.

两种冶炼工艺下A286高温合金的热变形行为

Hot deformation behavior of A286 superalloy with two different smelting processes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	舒玮, 宋丽强, 张威. 热变形对含铌奥氏体不锈钢07Cr18Ni11Nb再结晶行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 59-64.
[2]	何婵, 邹德宁, 赵洁, 陈兴润, 钱张信. 2507超级双相不锈钢的流变应力本构关系及热加工图[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 94-99.
[3]	强菲, 王文, 张婷, 杨娟, 蔡军, 王快社. Al-Zn-Mg-Cu铝合金厚板搅拌摩擦焊接头搅拌区微观组织[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 135-141.
[4]	郭利平, 何学清, 阳代军, 黄元春, 王强. Cu-0.5Cr-0.1Zr合金的热压缩变形行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 180-186.
[5]	廖雪峰, 张恒, 何学青, 黄元春, 李明. 不同Cr含量Cu-Cr-Zr合金的热拉伸变形行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 28-35.
[6]	李冬升, 赵恩旭, 王威, 谭莉, 张俊鹏, 田振宇. IN690合金的高温本构模型及动态再结晶模型[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 8-14.
[7]	王妮, 刘新宝, 朱麟, 李博, 权晨. P91钢的瞬态蠕变行为分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 20-25.
[8]	吉光, 高秀华, 龙金花. 微合金元素Nb对高碳合金钢动态再结晶行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 26-29.
[9]	包张飞, 唐丽娜, 吴杏苹, 栾佰峰. 2195铝锂合金的热变形行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 144-149.
[10]	潘龙博, 储滔, 张硕, 江济, 程采金, 谢庆忠, 邢学强, 斯庭智. 30CrNi3MoV钢动态再结晶行为及其模型的构建[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(7): 23-30.
[11]	王岩, 谷宇, 王珏, 李吉东. 镍基高温合金GH4698的热变形组织演变机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(6): 221-224.
[12]	尚丽梅, 王春旭, 韩顺, 厉勇, 庞学东, 李建新, 杨超. 基于摩擦-温度双修正的Maraging250钢热变形行为及热加工图[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(5): 111-117.
[13]	黎俊良, 邢军, 葛章琦, 李凡, 王永强, 李娜, 吴保桥. 新型低碳含铌热轧H型钢的热变形行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(5): 118-126.
[14]	邵春娟, 镇凡, 曲锦波, 雒广杰. 热变形参数对316L/Q370qE复合板结合强度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(5): 132-137.
[15]	刘洁, 徐乐, 何肖飞, 李晓源, 王毛球. Ti微合金化非调质钢中碳化物析出行为及其对再结晶的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(4): 9-15.