固溶温度对QBe1.9和QBe2铍铜合金组织与性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.03.015

金属热处理 ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 96-101.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.03.015

固溶温度对QBe1.9和QBe2铍铜合金组织与性能的影响

张保华^1,2, 董福元³, 崔书辉², 黄旭刚¹

1.西北稀有金属材料研究院宁夏有限公司稀有金属特种材料国家重点实验室, 宁夏石嘴山 753000;
2.宁夏中色新材料有限公司, 宁夏石嘴山 753000;
3. 北方民族大学材料科学与工程学院, 宁夏银川 750000

收稿日期:2024-09-16 修回日期:2025-01-27 出版日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-05-14
通讯作者: 黄旭刚,高级工程师,硕士,E-mail:huangxg2050@163.com
作者简介:张保华(1984—),男,工程师,学士,主要研究方向为铍青铜板带材工艺技术,E-mail:315372771@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2902304)

Effect of solution temperature on microstructure and properties of QBe1.9 and QBe2 beryllium copper alloys

Zhang Baohua^1,2, Dong Fuyuan³, Cui Shuhui², Huang Xugang¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Rare Metal Special Materials, Northwest Rare Metal Materials Research Institute Ningxia Co., Ltd., Shizuishan Ningxia 753000, China;
2. Ningxia Zhongse New Materials Co., Ltd., Shizuishan Ningxia 753000, China;
3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, North Minzu University, Yinchuan Ningxia 750000, China

Received:2024-09-16 Revised:2025-01-27 Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对QBe1.9和QBe2铍铜合金进行780、790、800 ℃的固溶处理和320 ℃的时效处理,研究固溶温度对两种合金显微组织和性能的影响。结果表明:QBe1.9铍铜合金充分固溶所需的驱动力更低,晶粒尺寸相对较小,分布更均匀。随着固溶温度的升高,QBe1.9和QBe2铍铜合金固溶后的硬度、抗拉强度和导电率不断降低,断后伸长率不断提高。320 ℃×3 h时效后,QBe1.9铍铜合金的抗拉强度和硬度远高于QBe2铍铜合金,导电率和断后伸长率不及QBe2铍铜合金。固溶温度为800 ℃时,两种合金的综合性能最优,此时QBe2铍铜合金硬度仅为327 HV0.5, 抗拉强度为1032.0 MPa,断后伸长率为8.9%,导电率为31.80%IACS;QBe1.9铍铜合金硬度达到404 HV0.5,抗拉强度达到1336.8 MPa,断后伸长率为7.3%,导电率为26.12%IACS。为企业提高QBe1.9铍铜合金力学性能的问题提供了解决方案。

关键词: QBe1.9铍铜合金, QBe2铍铜合金, 固溶温度, 力学性能

Abstract: Effect of solution temperature on microstructure and properties of QBe1.9 and QBe2 beryllium copper alloys was studied by solution treatment at 780, 790, 800 ℃ and aging treatment at 320 ℃. The results show that QBe1.9 beryllium copper alloy requires lower driving force for complete solution treatment, has smaller grain size and more uniform distribution. With the increase of solution temperature, the hardness, tensile strength and conductivity of the QBe1.9 and QBe2 beryllium copper alloys after solution treatment decrease continuously, while the elongation increases continuously. After aging at 320 ℃ for 3 h, the tensile strength and hardness of the QBe1.9 beryllium copper alloy are much higher than that of the QBe2 beryllium copper alloy, and the conductivity and elongation are lower than that of the QBe2 beryllium copper alloy. When the solution temperature is 800 ℃, the two alloys exhibit the optimal comprehensive properties. The hardness of the QBe2 beryllium copper alloy is only 327 HV0.5, the tensile strength is 1032.0 MPa, the elongation is 8.9%, and the conductivity is 31.80%IACS. The hardness of the QBe1.9 beryllium copper alloy is 404 HV0.5, the tensile strength is 1336.8 MPa, the elongation is 7.3%, and the conductivity is 26.12%IACS. It provides a solution to the problem of improving the mechanical properties of the QBe1.9 beryllium copper alloy.

Key words: QBe1.9 beryllium copper alloy, QBe2 beryllium copper alloy, solution temperature, mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TG166.2

张保华, 董福元, 崔书辉, 黄旭刚. 固溶温度对QBe1.9和QBe2铍铜合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 96-101.

Zhang Baohua, Dong Fuyuan, Cui Shuhui, Huang Xugang. Effect of solution temperature on microstructure and properties of QBe1.9 and QBe2 beryllium copper alloys[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2025, 50(3): 96-101.

参考文献

[1] 张保华, 焦晓亮, 崔书辉, 等. 连续淬火工艺对轧制态TBe2铍铜带材组织与性能的影响[J]. 宁夏工程技术, 2022, 21(4): 363-366.
Zhang Baohua, Jiao Xiaoliang, Cui Shuhui, et al. Effect of continuous quenching process on micro-structure and properties of rolled TBe2 beryllium copper strip[J]. Ningxia Engineering Technology, 2022, 21(4): 363-366.
[2] Zheng W, Jiang L, Yi Z, et al. Comparison of the mechanical properties and microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 alloys[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(7): 2570.
[3] 狄平. 铍青铜形变时效工艺的优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2003, 28(2): 63-64, 69.
Di Ping. Optimization of deformation aging process of beryllium bronze[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2003, 28(2): 63-64, 69.
[4] 黄旭刚, 李海龙, 张健康, 等. 固溶温度对铍青铜QBe2带材组织与性能的影响[J]. 特种铸造及有色合金, 2023, 43(12): 1669-1673.
Huang Xugang, Li Hailong, Zhang Jiankang, et al. Effects of solution temperture on microstructure and properties of beryllium bronze QBe2 strip[J]. Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys, 2023, 43(12): 1669-1673.
[5] 岳丽娟, 王艳婷, 赵红运, 等. QBe2铍青铜合金固溶工艺与组织性能研究[J]. 中国材料进展, 2022, 41(3): 237-240.
Yue Lijuan, Wang Yanting, Zhao Hongyun, et al. Study on solid solution technology and microstructure of QBe2 beryllium bronze alloy[J]. Materials China, 2022, 41(3): 237-240.
[6] 施永奎. 高强度QBe2铍铜合金线材的制备及性能研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2007.
[7] 朱庆丰, 王浩, 高扬, 等. 固溶温度对2050铝锂合金挤压棒材组织和性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2023, 51(11): 71-78.
Zhu Qingfeng, Wang Hao, Gao Yang, et al. Effect of solid solution temperature on microstructure and properties of 2050 Al-Li alloy extruded bars[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2023, 51(11): 71-78.
[8] Jia S F, Zhan L H, Zhang J. Influence of solid solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of 2219 aluminium alloy[J]. Materials Research Innovations, 2014, 18(S2): 52-58.
[9] 张茁, 陈康华. 固溶处理对 Al-Zn-Mg-Cu 铝合金电导率的影响[J]. 粉末冶金材料科学与工程, 2004, 9(1): 79-83.
Zhang Zhuo, Chen Kanghua. Effect of solution heat-treating on electrical conductivity of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu aluminum alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering of Powder Metallurgy, 2004, 9(1): 79-83.
[10] 王菲, 姜雁斌, 张志豪. Al含量对Cu-Be-Ni合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2021, 31(5): 1261-1269.
Wang Fei, Jiang Yanbin, Zhang Zhihao. Effect of Al content on microstructure and properties of Cu-Be-Ni alloy[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2021, 31(5): 1261-1269.
[11] 万金风, 赵帆, 刘新华. 旋锻复合铜包铍铜线材的组织性能[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2023, 33(3): 729-740.
Wan Jinfeng, Zhao Fan, Liu Xinhua. Microstructure and properties of copper-clad beryllium copper wire fabricated by rotary swaging[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2023, 33(3): 729-740.

[1]	李申奥, 陈思文, 牛红伟, 朱红倩, 阚允, 江艳, 王健, 赵洪运. 轧制温度对Sc微合金化Al-3.2Cu-1.5Li合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 1-8.
[2]	朱晨辉, 徐流杰, 谢红申, 石如星, 殷立涛. 回火温度对超级马氏体不锈钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 16-24.
[3]	王畅, 王良, 周培山, 申文竹, 王斌. 冷变形及热处理对GH738镍基合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 25-31.
[4]	赵伟男, 卢超, 曹建春, 徐朝勇, 杨立盛, 张金昌. 高压低温回火对铌微合金化高碳钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 32-37.
[5]	周晓舟, 孟利, 徐江杰, 张宁, 涂杨, 傅超, 杨勇. 挤压工艺对AZ80NC可溶镁合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 38-43.
[6]	徐和林, 王江华. 焊后热处理对4Cr5MoSiV模具钢修补焊接头组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 64-68.
[7]	王娇娇, 高云哲, 郭泰瑜, 侯伟, 周玉青, 任可飘, 赵林林, 张子悦. 回火时间对深井套管用钢组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 102-106.
[8]	郭旭东, 邹仕军, 卢影峰, 龙泽熙. 固溶工艺对7C04铝合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 132-137.
[9]	石磊, 田鹏勇, 温国强, 魏明江, 赵宇. 淬火工艺对铁素体/马氏体双相钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 138-142.
[10]	郭春成, 迟宏宵, 谷金波, 董丽丽, 朱留平. Mo对Fe-Co-Cr系轴承钢组织及强韧性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 150-157.
[11]	马若曦, 尹宇彬, 邓超, 李子瑜, 张哲临, 丁桦. Fe-18Mn-8Al-1C轻质钢的组织性能及变形机制[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 183-188.
[12]	周浩, 杜豪杰, 曾燕屏, 郭德瑞, 李炜丽, 马志宝, 王庆峰, 李旌鑫. 高温长时在役GH4145合金螺栓的显微组织和力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 189-195.
[13]	梁晓东, 王炜, 李永清, 袁博, 郭晓峰, 程言龙. G115钢大口径厚壁管长期时效后的微观组织及力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 196-200.
[14]	齐加胜, 徐文权. 汽车用中锰钢的研究现状与展望[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(3): 244-249.
[15]	刘明珠, 丁桦, 邹宇明. 部分奥氏体逆转变工艺对Fe-8Mn-0.2C-3Al中锰钢组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(2): 90-95.

固溶温度对QBe1.9和QBe2铍铜合金组织与性能的影响

Effect of solution temperature on microstructure and properties of QBe1.9 and QBe2 beryllium copper alloys

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价